# Standard vs. Modular Sampling: Best Practices for Reliable LLM Unlearning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05316 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05316/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 31 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07646/) (2022)
- [Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04933/) (2019)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01504/) (2022)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10683/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08787/) (2024)
- [Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10770/) (2022)
- [Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07298/) (2023)
- [Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07163/) (2024)
- [Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08607/) (2024)
- [RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10890/) (2024)
- [Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02879/) (2024)
- [Rethinking LLM Unlearning Objectives: A Gradient Perspective and Go Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19301/) (2025)
- [A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08109/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Who's Harry Potter: Towards Targeted Unlearning from a Causal Intervention Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16997/) (2024)
- [Alternate Preference Optimization for Unlearning Factual Knowledge in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13474/) (2024)
- [Which Retain Set Matters for LLM Unlearning? A Case Study on Entity Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11441/) (2025)
- [Preserving Privacy in Large Language Models: A Survey on Current Threats and Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05212/) (2024)
- [Not All Data Are Unlearned Equally](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05058/) (2025)
- [Opt-Out: Investigating Entity-Level Unlearning for Large Language Models via Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12329/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [GRACE:Gradient-guided Coreset Selection for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28361/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A conventional LLM Unlearning setting consists of two subsets -"forget" and "retain", with the objectives of removing the undesired knowledge from the forget set while preserving the remaining knowledge from the retain. In privacy-focused unlearning research, a retain set is often further divided into neighbor sets, containing either directly or indirectly connected to the forget targets; and augmented by a general-knowledge set. A common practice in existing benchmarks is to employ only a single neighbor set, with general knowledge which fails to reflect the real-world data complexities and relationships. LLM Unlearning typically involves 1:1 sampling or cyclic iteration sampling. However, the efficacy and stability of these de facto standards have not been critically examined. In this study, we systematically evaluate these common practices. Our findings reveal that relying on a single neighbor set is suboptimal and that a standard sampling approach can obscure performance trade-offs. Based on this analysis, we propose and validate an initial set of best practices: (1) Incorporation of diverse neighbor sets to balance forget efficacy and model utility, (2) Standard 1:1 sampling methods are inefficient and yield poor results, (3) Our proposed Modular Entity-Level Unlearning (MELU) strategy as an alternative to cyclic sampling. We demonstrate that this modular approach, combined with robust algorithms, provides a clear and stable path towards effective unlearning.