# Breaking to Build: A Threat Model of Prompt-Based Attacks for Securing LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04615 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04615/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/safety-alignment-and-jailbreak-attacks/)
- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05733/) (2023)
- [PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04528/) (2023)
- [LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01469/) (2023)
- [BadChain: Backdoor Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12242/) (2024)
- [Ignore This Title and HackAPrompt: Exposing Systemic Vulnerabilities of LLMs through a Global Scale Prompt Hacking Competition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16119/) (2023)
- [Black Box Adversarial Prompting for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04237/) (2023)
- [Tricking LLMs into Disobedience: Formalizing, Analyzing, and Detecting Jailbreaks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14965/) (2023)
- [TrojLLM: A Black-box Trojan Prompt Attack on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06815/) (2023)
- [Identifying and Mitigating Privacy Risks Stemming from Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01424/) (2023)
- [TrojText: Test-time Invisible Textual Trojan Insertion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02242/) (2023)
- [Trojan Detection in Large Language Models: Insights from The Trojan Detection Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13660/) (2024)
- [A Prompting-based Approach for Adversarial Example Generation and Robustness Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10714/) (2022)
- [Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02027/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced critical security challenges, where adversarial actors can manipulate input prompts to cause significant harm and circumvent safety alignments. These prompt-based attacks exploit vulnerabilities in a model's design, training, and contextual understanding, leading to intellectual property theft, misinformation generation, and erosion of user trust. A systematic understanding of these attack vectors is the foundational step toward developing robust countermeasures. This paper presents a comprehensive literature survey of prompt-based attack methodologies, categorizing them to provide a clear threat model. By detailing the mechanisms and impacts of these exploits, this survey aims to inform the research community's efforts in building the next generation of secure LLMs that are inherently resistant to unauthorized distillation, fine-tuning, and editing.