# MoSEs: Uncertainty-Aware AI-Generated Text Detection via Mixture of Stylistics Experts with Conditional Thresholds

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02499 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02499/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06146/) (2019)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Stories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01696/) (2016)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05540/) (2023)
- [RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03838/) (2023)
- [DialogSum: A Real-Life Scenario Dialogue Summarization Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06762/) (2021)
- [MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13242/) (2023)
- [DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17359/) (2023)
- [Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01103/) (2016)
- [Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18149/) (2023)
- [Visual Recognition with Deep Nearest Centroids](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07383/) (2022)
- [SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08903/) (2023)
- [Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06072/) (2024)
- [Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14057/) (2024)
- [Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScore](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04286/) (2024)
- [SciXGen: A Scientific Paper Dataset for Context-Aware Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10774/) (2021)
- [Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15337/) (2025)
- [DART: An AIGT Detector using AMR of Rephrased Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11517/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08031/) (2026)
- [C-ReD: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for AI-Generated Text Detection Derived from Real-World Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11796/) (2026)
- [Alignment Imprint: Zero-Shot AI-Generated Text Detection via Provable Preference Discrepancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16923/) (2026)
- [DEER: Disentangled Mixture of Experts with Instance-Adaptive Routing for Generalizable Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01192/) (2025)
- [Multi-Level Contextual Token Relation Modeling for Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16107/) (2026)
- [Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23190/) (2026)
- [MD-ProTector: Positioning Multiple Data-Driven Prototypes for LLM-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10459/) (2026)
- [Using LLMs to Detect LLM-Generated Texts: A Cross-Generation Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34691/) (2026)
- [CrisisFake: Benchmark Validity of AI-Generated Text Detection for Disaster Social Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35821/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models has intensified public concerns about the potential misuse. Therefore, it is important to build trustworthy AI-generated text detection systems. Existing methods neglect stylistic modeling and mostly rely on static thresholds, which greatly limits the detection performance. In this paper, we propose the Mixture of Stylistic Experts (MoSEs) framework that enables stylistics-aware uncertainty quantification through conditional threshold estimation. MoSEs contain three core components, namely, the Stylistics Reference Repository (SRR), the Stylistics-Aware Router (SAR), and the Conditional Threshold Estimator (CTE). For input text, SRR can activate the appropriate reference data in SRR and provide them to CTE. Subsequently, CTE jointly models the linguistic statistical properties and semantic features to dynamically determine the optimal threshold. With a discrimination score, MoSEs yields prediction labels with the corresponding confidence level. Our framework achieves an average improvement 11.34% in detection performance compared to baselines. More inspiringly, MoSEs shows a more evident improvement 39.15% in the low-resource case. Our code is available at https://github.com/creator-xi/MoSEs.