# ResearchQA: Evaluating Scholarly Question Answering at Scale Across 75 Fields with Survey-Mined Questions and Rubrics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00496 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00496/

## Key facts

- Cited by 49 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 48 of its 183 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06146/) (2019)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04475/) (2024)
- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03011/) (2021)
- [NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17428/) (2024)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05961/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00368/) (2023)
- [A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03716/) (2023)
- [Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21819/) (2024)
- [Generative Representational Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09906/) (2024)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06332/) (2021)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03601/) (2024)
- [AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveys](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10252/) (2024)
- [Decontextualization: Making Sentences Stand-Alone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05169/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [RubricHub: A Comprehensive and Highly Discriminative Rubric Dataset via Automated Coarse-to-Fine Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08430/) (2026)
- [Reward Hacking in Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12474/) (2026)
- [Enterprise Deep Research: Steerable Multi-Agent Deep Research for Enterprise Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17797/) (2025)
- [Learning Query-Specific Rubrics from Human Preferences for DeepResearch Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03619/) (2026)
- [Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12507/) (2026)
- [Environment Scaling for Interactive Agentic Experience Collection: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09586/) (2025)
- [EvoLM: Self-Evolving Language Models through Co-Evolved Discriminative Rubrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03871/) (2026)
- [RubricEM: Meta-RL with Rubric-guided Policy Decomposition beyond Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10899/) (2026)
- [EvoRubric: Self-Evolving Rubric-Driven RL for Open-Ended Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29847/) (2026)
- [Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19196/) (2026)
- [Rubric Dropout: A Simple Way to Mitigate Reward Hacking in Rubric-as-Reward RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11669/) (2026)
- [SCOPE: Self-Play via Co-Evolving Policies for Open-Ended Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31433/) (2026)
- [DEEPAMBIGQA: Ambiguous Multi-hop Questions for Benchmarking LLM Answer Completeness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01323/) (2025)
- [Grad2Reward: From Sparse Judgment to Dense Rewards for Improving Open-Ended LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01791/) (2026)
- [Deep Research, Shallow Evaluation: A Case Study in Meta-Evaluation for Long-Form QA Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06942/) (2026)
- [CriPO: Enhancing Rubric-based RL via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.18082/) (2026)
- [RPC-Bench: A Fine-grained Benchmark for Research Paper Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14289/) (2026)
- [From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08625/) (2026)
- [LitTraceQA: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Grounding and Verification in Scientific Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07370/) (2026)
- [Dr. Bench: A Multidimensional Evaluation for Deep Research Agents, from Answers to Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02190/) (2025)
- [Beyond Relevance-Centric Retrieval: Rubric-Oriented Document Set Selection and Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19747/) (2026)
- [Deep Research Pretraining via Predictive Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00432/) (2026)
- [PaperGym: Rubric-Centered Evolution for Research-Plan Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31119/) (2026)
- [Improving Attributed Long-form Question Answering with Intent Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27435/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04018/) (2026)
- [Deep Research as Rubric for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01091/) (2026)
- [DecoEvo: Score-Decoupled Co-Evolution of Solver and Rubric-Generator Skills in Text Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25675/) (2026)
- [SERPO: Self-Evolving Rubric Policy Optimization for Open-Ended Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26873/) (2026)
- [Training Documents Reranker with Search Rubrics for Deep Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03527/) (2026)
- [RISE-RL: Rubric-Informed Selective Exploration for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09123/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating long-form responses to research queries heavily relies on expert annotators, restricting attention to areas like AI where researchers can conveniently enlist colleagues. Yet, research expertise is abundant: survey articles consolidate knowledge spread across the literature. We introduce ResearchQA, a resource for evaluating LLM systems by distilling survey articles from 75 research fields into 21K queries and 160K rubric items. Queries and rubrics are jointly derived from survey sections, where rubric items list query-specific answer evaluation criteria, i.e., citing papers, making explanations, and describing limitations. 31 Ph.D. annotators in 8 fields judge that 90% of queries reflect Ph.D. information needs and 87% of rubric items warrant emphasis of a sentence or longer. We leverage ResearchQA to evaluate 18 systems in 7.6K head-to-heads. No parametric or retrieval-augmented system we evaluate exceeds 70% on covering rubric items, and the highest-ranking system shows 75% coverage. Error analysis reveals that the highest-ranking system fully addresses less than 11% of citation rubric items, 48% of limitation items, and 49% of comparison items. We release our data to facilitate more comprehensive multi-field evaluations.