# A Comparative Study of Controllability, Explainability, and Performance in Dysfluency Detection Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00058 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00058/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Unconstrained Dysfluency Modeling for Dysfluent Speech Transcription and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12810/) (2023)
- [YOLO-Stutter: End-to-end Region-Wise Speech Dysfluency Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15297/) (2024)
- [Towards Hierarchical Spoken Language Dysfluency Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10015/) (2024)
- [SSDM: Scalable Speech Dysfluency Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16221/) (2024)
- [FluentNet: End-to-End Detection of Speech Disfluency with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11394/) (2020)
- [Stutter-Solver: End-to-end Multi-lingual Dysfluency Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09621/) (2024)
- [Analysis and Evaluation of Synthetic Data Generation in Speech Dysfluency Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22029/) (2025)
- [Dysfluent WFST: A Framework for Zero-Shot Speech Dysfluency Transcription and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16351/) (2025)
- [Seamless Dysfluent Speech Text Alignment for Disordered Speech Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12073/) (2025)
- [LCS-CTC: Leveraging Soft Alignments to Enhance Phonetic Transcription Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03937/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in dysfluency detection have introduced a variety of modeling paradigms, ranging from lightweight object-detection inspired networks (YOLOStutter) to modular interpretable frameworks (UDM). While performance on benchmark datasets continues to improve, clinical adoption requires more than accuracy: models must be controllable and explainable. In this paper, we present a systematic comparative analysis of four representative approaches--YOLO-Stutter, FluentNet, UDM, and SSDM--along three dimensions: performance, controllability, and explainability. Through comprehensive evaluation on multiple datasets and expert clinician assessment, we find that YOLO-Stutter and FluentNet provide efficiency and simplicity, but with limited transparency; UDM achieves the best balance of accuracy and clinical interpretability; and SSDM, while promising, could not be fully reproduced in our experiments. Our analysis highlights the trade-offs among competing approaches and identifies future directions for clinically viable dysfluency modeling. We also provide detailed implementation insights and practical deployment considerations for each approach.