# Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Large Qubit Array based Quantum Sensor Circuits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21253 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21253/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Quantum reinforcement learning, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 1 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Quantum reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/quantum-reinforcement-learning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Reinforcement Learning Environment for Directed Quantum Circuit Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07054/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As the number of qubits in a sensor increases, the complexity of designing and controlling the quantum circuits grows exponentially. Manually optimizing these circuits becomes infeasible. Optimizing entanglement distribution in large-scale quantum circuits is critical for enhancing the sensitivity and efficiency of quantum sensors [5], [6]. This paper presents an engineering integration of reinforcement learning with tensor-network-based simulation (MPS) for scalable circuit optimization for optimizing quantum sensor circuits with up to 60 qubits. To enable efficient simulation and scalability, we adopt tensor network methods, specifically the Matrix Product State (MPS) representation, instead of traditional state vector or density matrix approaches. Our reinforcement learning agent learns to restructure circuits to maximize Quantum Fisher Information (QFI) and entanglement entropy while reducing gate counts and circuit depth. Experimental results show consistent improvements, with QFI values approaching 1, entanglement entropy in the 0.8-1.0 range, and up to 90% reduction in depth and gate count. These results highlight the potential of combining quantum machine learning and tensor networks to optimize complex quantum circuits under realistic constraints.