# Mapping Toxic Comments Across Demographics: A Dataset from German Public Broadcasting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21084 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21084/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Datasheets for Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09010/) (2018)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10289/) (2020)
- [Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00393/) (2018)
- [Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.04444/) (2018)
- [Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01670/) (2020)
- [CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03270/) (2019)
- [Multilingual Offensive Language Identification with Cross-lingual Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05324/) (2020)
- [Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04257/) (2018)
- [Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12860/) (2023)
- [Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19559/) (2024)
- [Investigating Annotator Bias in Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11109/) (2024)
- [Hateful Messages: A Conversational Data Set of Hate Speech produced by Adolescents on Discord](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01413/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Automated Data Enrichment using Confidence-Aware Fine-Grained Debate among Open-Source LLMs for Mental Health and Online Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06227/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A lack of demographic context in existing toxic speech datasets limits our understanding of how different age groups communicate online. In collaboration with funk, a German public service content network, this research introduces the first large-scale German dataset annotated for toxicity and enriched with platform-provided age estimates. The dataset includes 3,024 human-annotated and 30,024 LLM-annotated anonymized comments from Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. To ensure relevance, comments were consolidated using predefined toxic keywords, resulting in 16.7% labeled as problematic. The annotation pipeline combined human expertise with state-of-the-art language models, identifying key categories such as insults, disinformation, and criticism of broadcasting fees. The dataset reveals age-based differences in toxic speech patterns, with younger users favoring expressive language and older users more often engaging in disinformation and devaluation. This resource provides new opportunities for studying linguistic variation across demographics and supports the development of more equitable and age-aware content moderation systems.