# DashboardQA: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Question Answering on Interactive Dashboards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17398 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17398/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12326/) (2025)
- [SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10935/) (2024)
- [AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14573/) (2024)
- [DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.08163/) (2018)
- [Scene Text Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13648/) (2019)
- [PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00997/) (2019)
- [FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.07300/) (2017)
- [ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07981/) (2025)
- [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18521/) (2024)
- [Mobile-Agent-v3: Fundamental Agents for GUI Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15144/) (2025)
- [UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14761/) (2023)
- [Agent S2: A Compositional Generalist-Specialist Framework for Computer Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00906/) (2025)
- [Scaling Computer-Use Grounding via User Interface Decomposition and Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13227/) (2025)
- [ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05506/) (2025)
- [ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04172/) (2024)
- [OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19056/) (2024)
- [ChartInstruct: Instruction Tuning for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09028/) (2024)
- [OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06628/) (2022)
- [Are Large Vision Language Models up to the Challenge of Chart Comprehension and Reasoning? An Extensive Investigation into the Capabilities and Limitations of LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00257/) (2024)
- [MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14179/) (2024)
- [BigCharts-R1: Enhanced Chart Reasoning with Visual Reinforcement Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09804/) (2025)
- [Text2Vis: A Challenging and Diverse Benchmark for Generating Multimodal Visualizations from Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19969/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [ChartAct: A Benchmark for Dynamic Chart Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26994/) (2026)
- [Multilingual and Multimodal LLMs in the Wild: Building for Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17152/) (2026)
- [WidgetVA: A Widget-Centric Framework and Benchmark for Agentic Visual Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24094/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Dashboards are powerful visualization tools for data-driven decision-making, integrating multiple interactive views that allow users to explore, filter, and navigate data. Unlike static charts, dashboards support rich interactivity, which is essential for uncovering insights in real-world analytical workflows. However, existing question-answering benchmarks for data visualizations largely overlook this interactivity, focusing instead on static charts. This limitation severely constrains their ability to evaluate the capabilities of modern multimodal agents designed for GUI-based reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce DashboardQA, the first benchmark explicitly designed to assess how vision-language GUI agents comprehend and interact with real-world dashboards. The benchmark includes 112 interactive dashboards from Tableau Public and 405 question-answer pairs with interactive dashboards spanning five categories: multiple-choice, factoid, hypothetical, multi-dashboard, and conversational. By assessing a variety of leading closed- and open-source GUI agents, our analysis reveals their key limitations, particularly in grounding dashboard elements, planning interaction trajectories, and performing reasoning. Our findings indicate that interactive dashboard reasoning is a challenging task overall for all the VLMs evaluated. Even the top-performing agents struggle; for instance, the best agent based on Gemini-Pro-2.5 achieves only 38.69% accuracy, while the OpenAI CUA agent reaches just 22.69%, demonstrating the benchmark's significant difficulty. We release DashboardQA at https://github.com/vis-nlp/DashboardQA