# Uncovering and Mitigating Destructive Multi-Embedding Attacks in Deepfake Proactive Forensics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17247 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17247/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10196/) (2017)
- [StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01865/) (2019)
- [HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.09937/) (2018)
- [SimSwap: An Efficient Framework For High Fidelity Face Swapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06340/) (2021)
- [Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08457/) (2020)
- [EditGuard: Versatile Image Watermarking for Tamper Localization and Copyright Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08883/) (2023)
- [MBRS : Enhancing Robustness of DNN-based Watermarking by Mini-Batch of Real and Simulated JPEG Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08211/) (2021)
- [Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08726/) (2020)
- [Exploiting Fine-grained Face Forgery Clues via Progressive Enhancement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13977/) (2021)
- [SepMark: Deep Separable Watermarking for Unified Source Tracing and Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06321/) (2023)
- [LampMark: Proactive Deepfake Detection via Training-Free Landmark Perceptual Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17209/) (2024)
- [FaceSigns: Semi-Fragile Neural Watermarks for Media Authentication and Countering Deepfakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01960/) (2022)
- [Exposing Deepfake Face Forgeries with Guided Residuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00753/) (2022)
- [Robust Identity Perceptual Watermark Against Deepfake Face Swapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01357/) (2023)
- [FaceGuard: Proactive Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05673/) (2021)
- [Are Watermarks Bugs for Deepfake Detectors? Rethinking Proactive Forensics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17867/) (2024)
- [DiffMark: Diffusion-based Robust Watermark Against Deepfakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01428/) (2025)
- [Blind Robust VideoWatermarking Based on Adaptive Region Selection and Channel Reference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.13206/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [All in One: Unifying Deepfake Detection, Tampering Localization, and Source Tracing with a Robust Landmark-Identity Watermark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23523/) (2026)
- [Whether, Which, and Whose: Solving the Triple Challenge of Deepfake Proactive Forensics in Multi-Face Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26342/) (2026)
- [GIFGuard: Proactive Forensics against Deepfakes in Facial GIFs via Spatiotemporal Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26519/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid evolution of deepfake technologies and the wide dissemination of digital media, personal privacy is facing increasingly serious security threats. Deepfake proactive forensics, which involves embedding imperceptible watermarks to enable reliable source tracking, serves as a crucial defense against these threats. Although existing methods show strong forensic ability, they rely on an idealized assumption of single watermark embedding, which proves impractical in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we formally define and demonstrate the existence of Multi-Embedding Attacks (MEA) for the first time. When a previously protected image undergoes additional rounds of watermark embedding, the original forensic watermark can be destroyed or removed, rendering the entire proactive forensic mechanism ineffective. To address this vulnerability, we propose a general training paradigm named Adversarial Interference Simulation (AIS). Rather than modifying the network architecture, AIS explicitly simulates MEA scenarios during fine-tuning and introduces a resilience-driven loss function to enforce the learning of sparse and stable watermark representations. Our method enables the model to maintain the ability to extract the original watermark correctly even after a second embedding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our plug-and-play AIS training paradigm significantly enhances the robustness of various existing methods against MEA.
