# Explainable Counterfactual Reasoning in Depression Medication Selection at Multi-Levels (Personalized and Population)

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17207 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17207/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09369/) (2019)
- [Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11165/) (2020)
- [Towards Unifying Feature Attribution and Counterfactual Explanations: Different Means to the Same End](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04917/) (2020)
- [Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.08443/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [DMT: Demographic Conditioning, Morphology-Enhanced Transformer for Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation from PPG Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11125/) (2026)
- [MOSAIC: Orchestrating Collaborative Knowledge Tracing with Hierarchical Semantic Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29049/) (2026)
- [Estimating Treatment Effects for Depression in Longitudinal Therapy Switching Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27214/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Background: This study investigates how variations in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) symptoms, quantified by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), causally influence the prescription of SSRIs versus SNRIs. Methods: We applied explainable counterfactual reasoning with counterfactual explanations (CFs) to assess the impact of specific symptom changes on antidepressant choice. Results: Among 17 binary classifiers, Random Forest achieved highest performance (accuracy, F1, precision, recall, ROC-AUC near 0.85). Sample-based CFs revealed both local and global feature importance of individual symptoms in medication selection. Conclusions: Counterfactual reasoning elucidates which MDD symptoms most strongly drive SSRI versus SNRI selection, enhancing interpretability of AI-based clinical decision support systems. Future work should validate these findings on more diverse cohorts and refine algorithms for clinical deployment.
