# Hybrid Sequence Modeling and Reinforced Verification for Controllable Target-Conditioned Decision Making

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16420 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16420/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01345/) (2021)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06860/) (2021)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02039/) (2021)
- [RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10751/) (2021)
- [Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10150/) (2023)
- [Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01879/) (2024)
- [Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03993/) (2022)
- [Is Best-of-N the Best of Them? Coverage, Scaling, and Optimality in Inference-Time Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21878/) (2025)
- [Masked Trajectory Models for Prediction, Representation, and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02968/) (2023)
- [Emergent Agentic Transformer from Chain of Hindsight Experience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16554/) (2023)
- [ACT: Empowering Decision Transformer with Dynamic Programming via Advantage Conditioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05915/) (2023)
- [Enhancing textual textbook question answering with large language models and retrieval augmented generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05128/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Target-conditioned sequence models provide a simple interface for controllable offline decision making, but the requested target return can be an unreliable control signal, especially when the target return lies in underrepresented regions of the dataset. This paper proposes Doctor, a hybrid sequence modeling and reinforced verification framework for controllable target-conditioned offline decision making. Doctor trains a shared masked trajectory Transformer with two complementary objectives: masked trajectory reconstruction for candidate generation and in-sample value learning for action-value verification. At inference time, the model samples multiple nearby target returns, generates candidate actions in parallel, and selects the action whose verified value is closest to the requested target return. We analyze this verifier-guided selection rule and show that its value-level alignment error is bounded by candidate-value coverage around the target return and verifier accuracy. Experiments on D4RL and EpiCare show that Doctor improves target-return alignment under reduced high-return coverage, remains competitive on standard offline return-maximization benchmarks, and enables a single policy to modulate between conservative and aggressive operating points in a simulated clinical decision-making task. These results suggest that reinforced verification can improve the controllability of target-conditioned policies.