# Retrieval Enhanced Feedback via In-context Neural Error-book

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16313 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16313/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11691/) (2024)
- [Larger language models do in-context learning differently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03846/) (2023)
- [MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13257/) (2024)
- [VisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10594/) (2024)
- [MLLMs Know Where to Look: Training-free Perception of Small Visual Details with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17422/) (2025)
- [MMICL: Empowering Vision-language Model with Multi-Modal In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07915/) (2023)
- [SEED-Bench-2-Plus: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models with Text-Rich Visual Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16790/) (2024)
- [The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12451/) (2024)
- [Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07282/) (2023)
- [SPIQA: A Dataset for Multimodal Question Answering on Scientific Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09413/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20046/) (2024)
- [In-Context Principle Learning from Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05403/) (2024)
- [Stepwise Verification and Remediation of Student Reasoning Errors with Large Language Model Tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09136/) (2024)
- [MLLM-CompBench: A Comparative Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16837/) (2024)
- [Probabilistic Tree-of-thought Reasoning for Answering Knowledge-intensive Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13982/) (2023)
- [Follow-Up Differential Descriptions: Language Models Resolve Ambiguities for Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07593/) (2023)
- [RAVEN: Multitask Retrieval Augmented Vision-Language Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19150/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved reasoning capabilities, with in-context learning (ICL) emerging as a key technique for adaptation without retraining. While previous works have focused on leveraging correct examples, recent research highlights the importance of learning from errors to enhance performance. However, existing methods lack a structured framework for analyzing and mitigating errors, particularly in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), where integrating visual and textual inputs adds complexity. To address this issue, we propose REFINE: Retrieval-Enhanced Feedback via In-context Neural Error-book, a teacher-student framework that systematically structures errors and provides targeted feedback. REFINE introduces three systematic queries to construct structured feedback -- Feed-Target, Feed-Check, and Feed-Path -- to enhance multimodal reasoning by prioritizing relevant visual information, diagnosing critical failure points, and formulating corrective actions. Unlike prior approaches that rely on redundant retrievals, REFINE optimizes structured feedback retrieval, improving inference efficiency, token usage, and scalability. Our results demonstrate substantial speedup, reduced computational costs, and successful generalization, highlighting REFINE's potential for enhancing multimodal reasoning.