# Strategic Sample Selection for Improved Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks in Text Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15934 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15934/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Backdoor and data poisoning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/backdoor-and-data-poisoning-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06733/) (2017)
- [Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06660/) (2020)
- [Label-Consistent Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02771/) (2019)
- [A backdoor attack against LSTM-based text classification systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12457/) (2019)
- [Hidden Killer: Invisible Textual Backdoor Attacks with Syntactic Trigger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12400/) (2021)
- [BadNL: Backdoor Attacks against NLP Models with Semantic-preserving Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01043/) (2020)
- [Mind the Style of Text! Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks Based on Text Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07139/) (2021)
- [Watch Out for Your Agents! Investigating Backdoor Threats to LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11208/) (2024)
- [Backdoor Attacks on Pre-trained Models by Layerwise Weight Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13888/) (2021)
- [Be Careful about Poisoned Word Embeddings: Exploring the Vulnerability of the Embedding Layers in NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15543/) (2021)
- [Turn the Combination Lock: Learnable Textual Backdoor Attacks via Word Substitution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06361/) (2021)
- [A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08514/) (2022)
- [TrojanRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Can Be Backdoor Driver in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13401/) (2024)
- [Triggerless Backdoor Attack for NLP Tasks with Clean Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07970/) (2021)
- [BITE: Textual Backdoor Attacks with Iterative Trigger Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12700/) (2022)
- [Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures in Natural Language Processing Models: A Comprehensive Security Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06055/) (2023)
- [Kallima: A Clean-label Framework for Textual Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01832/) (2022)
- [Textual Backdoor Attacks Can Be More Harmful via Two Simple Tricks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08247/) (2021)
- [Gracefully Filtering Backdoor Samples for Generative Large Language Models without Retraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02454/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Backdoor attacks pose a significant threat to the integrity of text classification models used in natural language processing. While several dirty-label attacks that achieve high attack success rates (ASR) have been proposed, clean-label attacks are inherently more difficult. In this paper, we propose three sample selection strategies to improve attack effectiveness in clean-label scenarios: Minimum, Above50, and Below50. Our strategies identify those samples which the model predicts incorrectly or with low confidence, and by injecting backdoor triggers into such samples, we aim to induce a stronger association between the trigger patterns and the attacker-desired target label. We apply our methods to clean-label variants of four canonical backdoor attacks (InsertSent, WordInj, StyleBkd, SynBkd) and evaluate them on three datasets (IMDB, SST2, HateSpeech) and four model types (LSTM, BERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa). Results show that the proposed strategies, particularly the Minimum strategy, significantly improve the ASR over random sample selection with little or no degradation in the model's clean accuracy. Furthermore, clean-label attacks enhanced by our strategies outperform BITE, a state of the art clean-label attack method, in many configurations.