# Towards Reliable and Generalizable Differentially Private Machine Learning (Extended Version)

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15141 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15141/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 118 of its 196 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 118)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01412/) (2020)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06560/) (2017)
- [Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.00962/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05679/) (2021)
- [Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06500/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02003/) (2023)
- [Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05755/) (2016)
- [Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.02065/) (2016)
- [Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12206/) (2020)
- [Scalable Private Learning with PATE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08908/) (2018)
- [Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09679/) (2021)
- [Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00087/) (2018)
- [Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11660/) (2020)
- [Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clipping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03871/) (2019)
- [Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07709/) (2020)
- [SGD: General Analysis and Improved Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09401/) (2019)
- [R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10530/) (2019)
- [Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04535/) (2021)
- [Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07841/) (2024)
- [Numerical Composition of Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02848/) (2021)
- [How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00654/) (2023)
- [Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15429/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

There is a flurry of recent research papers proposing novel differentially private machine learning (DPML) techniques. These papers claim to achieve new state-of-the-art (SoTA) results and offer empirical results as validation. However, there is no consensus on which techniques are most effective or if they genuinely meet their stated claims. Complicating matters, heterogeneity in codebases, datasets, methodologies, and model architectures make direct comparisons of different approaches challenging. In this paper, we conduct a reproducibility and replicability (R+R) experiment on 11 different SoTA DPML techniques from the recent research literature. Results of our investigation are varied: while some methods stand up to scrutiny, others falter when tested outside their initial experimental conditions. We also discuss challenges unique to the reproducibility of DPML, including additional randomness due to DP noise, and how to address them. Finally, we derive insights and best practices to obtain scientifically valid and reliable results.