# ORThought: Benchmarking and Automating Logistics Optimization Modeling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14410 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14410/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 8 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13131/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [Solver-Informed RL: Grounding Large Language Models for Authentic Optimization Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11792/) (2025)
- [OptimAI: Optimization from Natural Language Using LLM-Powered AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16918/) (2025)
- [Auto-Formulating Dynamic Programming Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11737/) (2025)
- [RideAgent: An LLM-Enhanced Optimization Framework for Automated Taxi Fleet Operations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06608/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [OptiMind: Teaching LLMs to Think Like Optimization Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22979/) (2025)
- [Let's Have a Conversation: Designing and Evaluating LLM Agents for Interactive Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02666/) (2026)
- [MM-OptBench: A Solver-Grounded Benchmark for Multimodal Optimization Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12154/) (2026)
- [OptSkills: Learning Generalizable Optimization Skills from Problem Archetypes via Cluster-Based Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29829/) (2026)
- [NED-Tree: Bridging the Semantic Gap with Nonlinear Element Decomposition Tree for LLM Nonlinear Optimization Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01588/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Optimization modeling stands as the engine of scientific decision-making in logistics and transportation, yet its adoption is hindered by a steep expertise threshold and the latency of manual workflows. Automating this process via Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a potential solution, but current approaches face critical bottlenecks: (i) a lack of high-quality, complex benchmarks; (ii) methodological inefficiencies in autonomous multi-agent frameworks, which often exhibit instability and redundant computation; and (iii) evaluations that lack diagnostic depth. In this work, we address these challenges from the following three aspects. First, we introduce LogiOR, a diverse logistics benchmark with rigorous annotations, and enrich existing datasets with the same annotation standard to support community utilization. Second, we propose ORThought, a structured dual-agent framework. By incorporating expert-level modeling principles via chain-of-thought reasoning, ORThought eliminates the redundancy of uncontrolled autonomous agents. Third, extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that ORThought consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 9-17 percentage points, exhibiting distinct advantages in handling complex constraints while maintaining high token efficiency. Building on these results, we further conduct a multidimensional error analysis, which identifies key failure modes and success factors, providing actionable insights for future research. The dataset and code are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/LabMem012/LogiOR and https://github.com/ZJU-TSELab/ORThought, respectively.