# Input-Time Scaling: Adding Noise and Irrelevance into Less-Is-More Drastically Improves Reasoning Performance and Efficiency

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13654 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13654/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.20094/) (2024)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22312/) (2025)
- [Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12215/) (2025)
- [Wait, We Don't Need to "Wait"! Removing Thinking Tokens Improves Reasoning Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08343/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00674/) (2025)
- [Infinity Instruct: Scaling Instruction Selection and Synthesis to Enhance Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11116/) (2025)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00294/) (2025)
- [LLMs are Greedy Agents: Effects of RL Fine-tuning on Decision-Making Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16078/) (2025)
- [Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02980/) (2024)
- [Reflect, Retry, Reward: Self-Improving LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24726/) (2025)
- [Instruct-SkillMix: A Powerful Pipeline for LLM Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14774/) (2024)
- [Climbing the Ladder of Reasoning: What LLMs Can-and Still Can't-Solve after SFT?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11741/) (2025)
- [On the Effect of Sampling Diversity in Scaling LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11027/) (2025)
- [Grokking in the Wild: Data Augmentation for Real-World Multi-Hop Reasoning with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20752/) (2025)
- [MiroMind-M1: An Open-Source Advancement in Mathematical Reasoning via Context-Aware Multi-Stage Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14683/) (2025)
- [Diversity-Enhanced Reasoning for Subjective Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20187/) (2025)
- [Only-IF:Revealing the Decisive Effect of Instruction Diversity on Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04717/) (2024)
- [PersonaMath: Boosting Mathematical Reasoning via Persona-Driven Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01504/) (2024)
- [Inside-Out: Hidden Factual Knowledge in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15299/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at reasoning, traditionally requiring high-quality large-scale data and extensive training. Recent works reveal a very appealing Less-Is-More phenomenon where very small, carefully curated high-quality datasets match resource-intensive approaches. In this work, we further systematically relax their quality constraints by adding controlled noise via persona context relevance and comparing datasets of different qualities. Counterintuitively, we find that mixing relevant and irrelevant contexts consistently across training and inference stages yields optimal results -- a phenomenon we term training-testing co-design. Dataset quality comparisons show that high-quality data benefits weaker models on easy questions, while low-quality data achieves higher scores on hard questions with capable models. Across our experiments, reasoning performance is linked to reasoning efficiency. We, for the first time, found adding noisy and irrelevant contexts into queries can improve reasoning efficiency without any prices and targeted designs. Building on these insights, we propose Input-Time Scaling: applying small, low-quality data to capable models with training-testing co-design. This maintains Less-Is-More while further removing labor-intensive quality curation and improving reasoning effectiveness and efficiency, making the approach more applicable and affordable. Our method achieves 76.7% pass@1 on AIME24/25 using Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, and 90.0%/80.0% with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B -- state-of-the-art among Qwen2.5-32B variants. We are open-sourcing our datasets, pipelines, evaluation results, and checkpoints to facilitate reproducibility and further research.