# The Structural Sources of Verb Meaning Revisited: Large Language Models Display Syntactic Bootstrapping

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12482 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12482/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM synthetic data generation, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs.
- Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [LLM synthetic data generation](https://mlsanity.com/synth/llm-synthetic-data-generation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Little](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06644/) (2021)
- [Does syntax need to grow on trees? Sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03632/) (2020)
- [Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19827/) (2024)
- [Grokking of Hierarchical Structure in Vanilla Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18741/) (2023)
- [Can neural networks acquire a structural bias from raw linguistic data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06761/) (2020)
- [Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15750/) (2024)
- [Visual Grounding Helps Learn Word Meanings in Low-Data Regimes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13257/) (2023)
- [Manipulating language models' training data to study syntactic constraint learning: the case of English passivization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04593/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Is Child-Directed Language Optimized for Word Learning? A Computational Study of Verb Meaning Acquisition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12047/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Syntactic bootstrapping (Gleitman, 1990) is the hypothesis that children use the syntactic environments in which a verb occurs to learn its meaning. In this paper, we examine whether large language models exhibit a similar behavior. We do this by training RoBERTa and GPT-2 on perturbed datasets where syntactic information is ablated. Our results show that models' verb representation degrades more when syntactic cues are removed than when co-occurrence information is removed. Furthermore, the representation of mental verbs, for which syntactic bootstrapping has been shown to be particularly crucial in human verb learning, is more negatively impacted in such training regimes than physical verbs. In contrast, models' representation of nouns is affected more when co-occurrences are distorted than when syntax is distorted. In addition to reinforcing the important role of syntactic bootstrapping in verb learning, our results demonstrated the viability of testing developmental hypotheses on a larger scale through manipulating the learning environments of large language models.
