# Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10919 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10919/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14459/) (2023)
- [Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09315/) (2024)
- [Cooperating with Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06207/) (2017)
- [Transitioning to human interaction with AI systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05424/) (2021)
- [A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00405/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models as Markov Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02724/) (2024)
- [Human-AI Coevolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13723/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05511/) (2024)
- [Strategic Chain-of-Thought: Guiding Accurate Reasoning in LLMs through Strategy Elicitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03271/) (2024)
- [Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.08462/) (2016)
- [Generative AI and Its Impact on Personalized Intelligent Tutoring Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10650/) (2024)
- [The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-sectional and Time-series Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04156/) (2016)
- [A Map of Exploring Human Interaction patterns with LLM: Insights into Collaboration and Creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04570/) (2024)
- [Transition Network Analysis: A Novel Framework for Modeling, Visualizing, and Identifying the Temporal Patterns of Learners and Learning Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15486/) (2024)
- [A modern approach to transition analysis and process mining with Markov models: A tutorial with R](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08558/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While research on human-AI collaboration exists, it mainly examined language learning and used traditional counting methods with little attention to evolution and dynamics of collaboration on cognitively demanding tasks. This study examines human-AI interactions while solving a complex problem. Student-AI interactions were qualitatively coded and analyzed with transition network analysis, sequence analysis and partial correlation networks as well as comparison of frequencies using chi-square and Person-residual shaded Mosaic plots to map interaction patterns, their evolution, and their relationship to problem complexity and student performance. Findings reveal a dominant Instructive pattern with interactions characterized by iterative ordering rather than collaborative negotiation. Oftentimes, students engaged in long threads that showed misalignment between their prompts and AI output that exemplified a lack of synergy that challenges the prevailing assumptions about LLMs as collaborative partners. We also found no significant correlations between assignment complexity, prompt length, and student grades suggesting a lack of cognitive depth, or effect of problem difficulty. Our study indicates that the current LLMs, optimized for instruction-following rather than cognitive partnership, compound their capability to act as cognitively stimulating or aligned collaborators. Implications for designing AI systems that prioritize cognitive alignment and collaboration are discussed.
