# Semantic Structure in Large Language Model Embeddings

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10003 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10003/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08412/) (2017)
- [Linear Representations of Sentiment in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15154/) (2023)
- [The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01506/) (2024)
- [The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09288/) (2018)
- [An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01849/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05115/) (2026)
- [The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09782/) (2025)
- [Team, Then Trim: An Assembly-Line LLM Framework for High-Quality Tabular Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04785/) (2026)
- [Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09271/) (2026)
- [C-Mining: Unsupervised Discovery of Seeds for Cultural Data Synthesis via Geometric Misalignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.15675/) (2026)
- [Semantic Structure of Feature Space in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27169/) (2026)
- [N-GRPO: Embedding-Level Neighbor Mixing for Enhanced Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10768/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Psychological research consistently finds that human ratings of words across diverse semantic scales can be reduced to a low-dimensional form with relatively little information loss. We find that the semantic associations encoded in the embedding matrices of large language models (LLMs) exhibit a similar structure. We show that the projections of words on semantic directions defined by antonym pairs (e.g. kind - cruel) correlate highly with human ratings, and further find that these projections effectively reduce to a 3-dimensional subspace within LLM embeddings, closely resembling the patterns derived from human survey responses. Moreover, we find that shifting tokens along one semantic direction causes off-target effects on geometrically aligned features proportional to their cosine similarity. These findings suggest that semantic features are entangled within LLMs similarly to how they are interconnected in human language, and a great deal of semantic information, despite its apparent complexity, is surprisingly low-dimensional. Furthermore, accounting for this semantic structure may prove essential for avoiding unintended consequences when steering features.
