# Modern Neural Networks for Small Tabular Datasets: The New Default for Field-Scale Digital Soil Mapping?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09888 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09888/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 83 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05482/) (2022)
- [Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11959/) (2021)
- [TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01848/) (2022)
- [TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07442/) (2019)
- [Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03253/) (2021)
- [AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11921/) (2018)
- [Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09816/) (2020)
- [TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05564/) (2025)
- [When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02997/) (2023)
- [On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05556/) (2022)
- [TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16791/) (2025)
- [TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensembling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24210/) (2024)
- [Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04491/) (2024)
- [Hyperparameters and Tuning Strategies for Random Forest](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.03515/) (2018)
- [TabR: Tabular Deep Learning Meets Nearest Neighbors in 2023](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14338/) (2023)
- [Retrieval & Fine-Tuning for In-Context Tabular Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05207/) (2024)
- [T2G-Former: Organizing Tabular Features into Relation Graphs Promotes Heterogeneous Feature Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16887/) (2022)
- [A Closer Look at Deep Learning Methods on Tabular Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00956/) (2024)
- [A Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17361/) (2025)
- [TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19380/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Nearest Neighbor for Tabular Data: A Deep Tabular Baseline Two Decades Later](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03257/) (2024)
- [Learnable Uncertainty under Laplace Approximations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02720/) (2020)
- [Learning Internal Representations (COLT 1995)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05781/) (2019)
- [Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11323/) (2023)
- [MotherNet: Fast Training and Inference via Hyper-Network Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08598/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [TabPFN-2.5: Advancing the State of the Art in Tabular Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08667/) (2025)
- [TabPFN-3: Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13986/) (2026)
- [Kriging prior Regression: A Case for Kriging-Based Spatial Features with TabPFN in Soil Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09408/) (2025)
- [Rejections Based on Predictive Uncertainty Enable Reliable Routine Soil Spectroscopy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of pedometrics, tabular machine learning is the predominant method for soil property prediction from remote and proximal soil sensing data, forming a central component of Digital Soil Mapping (DSM). At the field-scale, this predictive soil modeling (PSM) task is typically constrained by small training sample sizes and high feature-to-sample ratios in soil spectroscopy. Traditionally, these conditions have proven challenging for conventional deep learning methods. Classical machine learning algorithms, particularly tree-based models like Random Forest and linear models such as Partial Least Squares Regression, have long been the default choice for pedometric modeling within DSM. Recent advances in artificial neural networks (ANN) for tabular data challenge this view, yet their suitability for field-scale DSM has not been proven. We introduce a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates state-of-the-art ANN architectures, including the latest multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based models (TabM, RealMLP), attention-based transformer variants (FT-Transformer, ExcelFormer, T2G-Former, AMFormer), retrieval-augmented approaches (TabR, ModernNCA), and an in-context learning foundation model (TabPFN). Our evaluation encompasses 31 field- and farm-scale datasets containing 30-460 soil samples and three critical soil properties: soil organic matter or soil organic carbon, pH, and clay content. Our results reveal that modern ANNs consistently outperform classical methods on the majority of tasks, demonstrating that deep learning has matured sufficiently to overcome the long-standing dominance of classical machine learning in pedometrics. Notably, TabPFN delivers the strongest overall performance, showing robustness across varying conditions. We therefore recommend the adoption of modern ANNs for field-scale DSM and propose TabPFN as the new default choice in the toolkit of every pedometrician.