# An Automated Multi-modal Evaluation Framework for Mobile Intelligent Assistants Based on Large Language Models and Multi-Agent Collaboration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09507 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09507/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 1 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [BlueLM-V-3B: Algorithm and System Co-Design for Multimodal Large Language Models on Mobile Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10640/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of mobile intelligent assistant technologies, multi-modal AI assistants have become essential interfaces for daily user interactions. However, current evaluation methods face challenges including high manual costs, inconsistent standards, and subjective bias. This paper proposes an automated multi-modal evaluation framework based on large language models and multi-agent collaboration. The framework employs a three-tier agent architecture consisting of interaction evaluation agents, semantic verification agents, and experience decision agents. Through supervised fine-tuning on the Qwen3-8B model, we achieve a significant evaluation matching accuracy with human experts. Experimental results on eight major intelligent agents demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in predicting users' satisfaction and identifying generation defects.