# InterChart: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning Across Decomposed and Distributed Chart Information

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07630 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07630/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Chart understanding and anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/chart-understanding-and-anomaly-detection/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06395/) (2024)
- [Phi-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08905/) (2024)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.07300/) (2017)
- [Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12637/) (2024)
- [ChartLlama: A Multimodal LLM for Chart Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16483/) (2023)
- [ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05506/) (2025)
- [InfoChartQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal Question Answering on Infographic Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19028/) (2025)
- [Domain Knowledge Graph Construction Via A Simple Checker](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04949/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [ChartDiff: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Comprehending Pairs of Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28902/) (2026)
- [DIAGRAMS: A Review Framework for Reasoning-Level Attribution in Diagram QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00905/) (2026)
- [Beyond Text-to-SQL: An Agentic LLM System for Governed Enterprise Analytics APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21027/) (2026)
- [Do Large Language Models Understand Data Visualization Principles?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20084/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce InterChart, a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how well vision-language models (VLMs) reason across multiple related charts, a task central to real-world applications such as scientific reporting, financial analysis, and public policy dashboards. Unlike prior benchmarks focusing on isolated, visually uniform charts, InterChart challenges models with diverse question types ranging from entity inference and trend correlation to numerical estimation and abstract multi-step reasoning grounded in 2-3 thematically or structurally related charts. We organize the benchmark into three tiers of increasing difficulty: (1) factual reasoning over individual charts, (2) integrative analysis across synthetically aligned chart sets, and (3) semantic inference over visually complex, real-world chart pairs. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art open- and closed-source VLMs reveals consistent and steep accuracy declines as chart complexity increases. We find that models perform better when we decompose multi-entity charts into simpler visual units, underscoring their struggles with cross-chart integration. By exposing these systematic limitations, InterChart provides a rigorous framework for advancing multimodal reasoning in complex, multi-visual environments.
