# Membership Inference Attack with Partial Features

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06244 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06244/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Membership inference attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/membership-inference-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16927/) (2023)
- [Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14321/) (2020)
- [Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07853/) (2021)
- [Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.10595/) (2020)
- [White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11229/) (2019)
- [OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09301/) (2023)
- [Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15528/) (2020)
- [Data-Free Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14779/) (2020)
- [Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03262/) (2023)
- [Mean-Shifted Contrastive Loss for Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03844/) (2021)
- [Practical Blind Membership Inference Attack via Differential Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01341/) (2021)
- [Nearest Neighbor Guidance for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14888/) (2023)
- [Label-Only Model Inversion Attacks via Boundary Repulsion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01925/) (2022)
- [SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10986/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Linear Speedup Analysis for Asynchronous Stochastic Parallel Optimization from Zeroth-Order to First-Order](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.00498/) (2016)
- [Are Your Sensitive Attributes Private? Novel Model Inversion Attribute Inference Attacks on Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09370/) (2022)
- [Black-box Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08207/) (2023)
- [Detecting Out-of-Distribution Through the Lens of Neural Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01479/) (2023)
- [SNAP: Efficient Extraction of Private Properties with Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12348/) (2022)
- [A Linear Reconstruction Approach for Attribute Inference Attacks against Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10053/) (2023)
- [Dissecting Distribution Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07591/) (2022)
- [SLMIA-SR: Speaker-Level Membership Inference Attacks against Speaker Recognition Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07983/) (2023)
- [OSLO: One-Shot Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16978/) (2024)
- [Online Drift Detection with Maximum Concept Discrepancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05375/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SoK: Rethinking Membership Inference in Tabular Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18486/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models are vulnerable to membership inference attack, which can be used to determine whether a given sample appears in the training data. Most existing methods assume the attacker has full access to the features of the target sample. This assumption, however, does not hold in many real-world scenarios where only partial features are available, thereby limiting the applicability of these methods. In this work, we introduce Partial Feature Membership Inference (PFMI), a scenario where the adversary observes only partial features of each sample and aims to infer whether this observed subset was present in the training set. To address this problem, we propose MRAD (Memory-guided Reconstruction and Anomaly Detection), a two-stage attack framework that works in both white-box and black-box settings. In the first stage, MRAD leverages the latent memory of the target model to reconstruct the unknown features of the sample. We observe that when the known features are absent from the training set, the reconstructed sample deviates significantly from the true data distribution. Consequently, in the second stage, we use anomaly detection algorithms to measure the deviation between the reconstructed sample and the training data distribution, thereby determining whether the known features belong to a member of the training set. Empirical results demonstrate that MRAD is effective across various datasets, and maintains compatibility with off-the-shelf anomaly detection techniques. For example, on STL-10, our attack exceeds an AUC of around 0.75 even with 60% of the missing features.
