# The Term 'Agent' Has Been Diluted Beyond Utility and Requires Redefinition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05338 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05338/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01560/) (2023)
- [SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01557/) (2023)
- [Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Governance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21848/) (2025)
- [GUIDE: Real-Time Human-Shaped Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15181/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [The Narrative Continuity Test: A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Identity Persistence in AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24831/) (2025)
- [MARC: Multimodal and Multi-Task Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Cold-Start Recommender System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08181/) (2025)
- [When Helpfulness Becomes Sycophancy: Sycophancy is a Boundary Failure Between Social Alignment and Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05403/) (2026)
- [Signals in the Noise: Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) for AI Loss of Control Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20610/) (2026)
- [Towards Agentic AI Governance: A Preliminary Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07612/) (2026)
- [Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11018/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The term 'agent' in artificial intelligence has long carried multiple interpretations across different subfields. Recent developments in AI capabilities, particularly in large language model systems, have amplified this ambiguity, creating significant challenges in research communication, system evaluation and reproducibility, and policy development. This paper argues that the term 'agent' requires redefinition. Drawing from historical analysis and contemporary usage patterns, we propose a framework that defines clear minimum requirements for a system to be considered an agent while characterizing systems along a multidimensional spectrum of environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal complexity, and temporal coherence. This approach provides precise vocabulary for system description while preserving the term's historically multifaceted nature. After examining potential counterarguments and implementation challenges, we provide specific recommendations for moving forward as a field, including suggestions for terminology standardization and framework adoption. The proposed approach offers practical tools for improving research clarity and reproducibility while supporting more effective policy development.