# VER-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Reasoning with Fine-Grained Visual Evidence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04852 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04852/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 31 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10592/) (2023)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01800/) (2024)
- [How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16821/) (2024)
- [mPLUG-Owl: Modularization Empowers Large Language Models with Multimodality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14178/) (2023)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03079/) (2023)
- [VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11691/) (2024)
- [InternLM2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17297/) (2024)
- [InternLM-XComposer2: Mastering Free-form Text-Image Composition and Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16420/) (2024)
- [MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13257/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-1M Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15383/) (2025)
- [To See is to Believe: Prompting GPT-4V for Better Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07574/) (2023)
- [SPHINX-X: Scaling Data and Parameters for a Family of Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05935/) (2024)
- [MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09621/) (2025)
- [Virgo: A Preliminary Exploration on Reproducing o1-like MLLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01904/) (2025)
- [Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13953/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [VCU-Bridge: Hierarchical Visual Connotation Understanding via Semantic Bridging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18121/) (2025)
- [MM-CondChain: A Programmatically Verified Benchmark for Visually Grounded Deep Compositional Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12266/) (2026)
- [Routing Before Looking: Query-Adaptive Evidence Acquisition for Long-form Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20805/) (2026)
- [TraceAV-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Hop Trajectory Reasoning over Long Audio-Visual Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07593/) (2026)
- [Exploring Diagnostic Prompting Approach for Multimodal LLM-based Visual Complexity Assessment: A Case Study of Amazon Search Result Pages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00082/) (2025)
- [Can You Trust What You See? Human and AI Detection of Synthetic Legal Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07613/) (2026)
- [From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26196/) (2026)
- [CRAG-MM-Diagnostics: Enabling Stage-Wise Analysis of Knowledge-Intensive VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.21155/) (2026)
- [Can't Find Waldo: Evaluating VLMs' Sensitivity to Image Resolution and Detail Level](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.31706/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of MLLMs, evaluating their visual capabilities has become increasingly crucial. Current benchmarks primarily fall into two main types: basic perception benchmarks, which focus on local details but lack deep reasoning (e.g., "what is in the image?"), and mainstream reasoning benchmarks, which concentrate on prominent image elements but may fail to assess subtle clues requiring intricate analysis. However, profound visual understanding and complex reasoning depend more on interpreting subtle, inconspicuous local details than on perceiving salient, macro-level objects. These details, though occupying minimal image area, often contain richer, more critical information for robust analysis. To bridge this gap, we introduce the VER-Bench, a novel framework to evaluate MLLMs' ability to: 1) identify fine-grained visual clues, often occupying on average just 0.25% of the image area; 2) integrate these clues with world knowledge for complex reasoning. Comprising 374 carefully designed questions across Geospatial, Temporal, Situational, Intent, System State, and Symbolic reasoning, each question in VER-Bench is accompanied by structured evidence: visual clues and question-related reasoning derived from them. VER-Bench reveals current models' limitations in extracting subtle visual evidence and constructing evidence-based arguments, highlighting the need to enhance models's capabilities in fine-grained visual evidence extraction, integration, and reasoning for genuine visual understanding and human-like analysis. Dataset and additional materials are available https://github.com/verbta/ACMMM-25-Materials.