# CF-RAG: A Dataset and Method for Carbon Footprint QA Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03489 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03489/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Agentic RAG, agents and memory](https://mlsanity.com/rag/agentic-rag-agents-and-memory/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08909/) (2020)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09118/) (2021)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03299/) (2022)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07624/) (2021)
- [HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07347/) (2020)
- [SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05179/) (2017)
- [TAT-LLM: A Specialized Language Model for Discrete Reasoning over Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13223/) (2024)
- [UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08249/) (2022)
- [DyRRen: A Dynamic Retriever-Reranker-Generator Model for Numerical Reasoning over Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12668/) (2022)
- [Multi-View Graph Representation Learning for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03458/) (2023)
- [FinLLMs: A Framework for Financial Reasoning Dataset Generation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10744/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [GaiaFlow: Semantic-Guided Diffusion Tuning for Carbon-Frugal Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15423/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Product sustainability reports provide valuable insights into the environmental impacts of a product and are often distributed in PDF format. These reports often include a combination of tables and text, which complicates their analysis. The lack of standardization and the variability in reporting formats further exacerbate the difficulty of extracting and interpreting relevant information from large volumes of documents. In this paper, we tackle the challenge of answering questions related to carbon footprints within sustainability reports available in PDF format. Unlike previous approaches, our focus is on addressing the difficulties posed by the unstructured and inconsistent nature of text extracted from PDF parsing. To facilitate this analysis, we introduce CarbonPDF-QA, an open-source dataset containing question-answer pairs for 1735 product report documents, along with human-annotated answers. Our analysis shows that GPT-4o struggles to answer questions with data inconsistencies. To address this limitation, we propose CarbonPDF, an LLM-based technique specifically designed to answer carbon footprint questions on such datasets. We develop CarbonPDF by fine-tuning Llama 3 with our training data. Our results show that our technique outperforms current state-of-the-art techniques, including question-answering (QA) systems finetuned on table and text data.