# When Cars Have Stereotypes: Auditing Demographic Bias in Objects from Text-to-Image Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03483 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03483/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11487/) (2022)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05239/) (2018)
- [Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03759/) (2022)
- [DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04053/) (2022)
- [Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06034/) (2023)
- [Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15052/) (2020)
- [The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02904/) (2022)
- [The Bias Amplification Paradox in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00755/) (2023)
- [Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01030/) (2024)
- [OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07990/) (2024)
- [Directional Bias Amplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12594/) (2021)
- [VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12424/) (2023)
- [TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01261/) (2023)
- [Inspecting the Geographical Representativeness of Images from Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11080/) (2023)
- [T2IAT: Measuring Valence and Stereotypical Biases in Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00905/) (2023)
- ['Person' == Light-skinned, Western Man, and Sexualization of Women of Color: Stereotypes in Stable Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19981/) (2023)
- [GenderBias-VL: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00600/) (2024)
- [Stable Diffusion Exposed: Gender Bias from Prompt to Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03027/) (2023)
- [Attribute-Centric Compositional Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01413/) (2023)
- [Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13383/) (2025)
- [DIG In: Evaluating Disparities in Image Generations with Indicators for Geographic Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06198/) (2023)
- [Exploring Bias in over 100 Text-to-Image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08012/) (2025)
- [Analysing Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Models using Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08025/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While prior research on text-to-image generation has predominantly focused on biases in human depictions, demographic bias in generated objects remains relatively underexplored. We introduce SODA (Stereotyped Object Diagnostic Audit), a novel framework for systematically measuring these biases through automated attribute discovery and three standardized metrics: Base vs. Demographic Divergence (BDS), Cross-Demographic Disparity (CDS), and Visual Attribute Concentration (VAC). Applying SODA to 8,000 images across five state-of-the-art models and eight object categories (e.g., cars), we find that "neutral" prompts produce outputs most visually similar to middle-aged and White people, suggesting these groups are implicitly over-represented in model defaults. Furthermore, demographic cues trigger highly skewed stereotypical outputs: 26.6% of object-model-demographic combinations produce results where all 20 generated images share the exact same attribute value (e.g., rose gold laptops for women). Finally, prompt-level debiasing reduces inter-group disparity but paradoxically collapses within-group diversity, replacing one stereotype with another. SODA offers a practical pipeline for making these implicit associations measurable, serving as a step toward more responsible AI development.