# Software Fairness Dilemma: Is Bias Mitigation a Zero-Sum Game?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03323 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03323/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07593/) (2018)
- [Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08452/) (2016)
- [Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10742/) (2019)
- [A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04422/) (2018)
- [Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07068/) (2022)
- [Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12195/) (2021)
- [Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10223/) (2022)
- [Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12379/) (2020)
- [Fair Preprocessing: Towards Understanding Compositional Fairness of Data Transformers in Machine Learning Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06054/) (2021)
- [NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.13214/) (2021)
- [The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by default](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02404/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03277/) (2022)
- [Fairness-aware Configuration of Machine Learning Libraries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06196/) (2022)
- [FairNeuron: Improving Deep Neural Network Fairness with Adversary Games on Selective Neurons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02567/) (2022)
- [FairMask: Better Fairness via Model-based Rebalancing of Protected Attributes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01109/) (2021)
- [Adaptive Fairness Improvement Based on Causality Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07190/) (2022)
- [A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03695/) (2024)
- [Don't Lie to Me: Avoiding Malicious Explanations with STEALTH](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10407/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Fairness Is Not Just Ethical: Performance Trade-Off via Data Correlation Tuning to Mitigate Bias in ML Software](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21348/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness is a critical requirement for Machine Learning (ML) software, driving the development of numerous bias mitigation methods. Previous research has identified a leveling-down effect in bias mitigation for computer vision and natural language processing tasks, where fairness is achieved by lowering performance for all groups without benefiting the unprivileged group. However, it remains unclear whether this effect applies to bias mitigation for tabular data tasks, a key area in fairness research with significant real-world applications. This study evaluates eight bias mitigation methods for tabular data, including both widely used and cutting-edge approaches, across 44 tasks using five real-world datasets and four common ML models. Contrary to earlier findings, our results show that these methods operate in a zero-sum fashion, where improvements for unprivileged groups are related to reduced benefits for traditionally privileged groups. However, previous research indicates that the perception of a zero-sum trade-off might complicate the broader adoption of fairness policies. To explore alternatives, we investigate an approach that applies the state-of-the-art bias mitigation method solely to unprivileged groups, showing potential to enhance benefits of unprivileged groups without negatively affecting privileged groups or overall ML performance. Our study highlights potential pathways for achieving fairness improvements without zero-sum trade-offs, which could help advance the adoption of bias mitigation methods.