# Fine-grained Multiple Supervisory Network for Multi-modal Manipulation Detecting and Grounding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02479/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.17249/) (2021)
- [Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02406/) (2021)
- [LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01057/) (2020)
- [FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01286/) (2018)
- [Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12376/) (2021)
- [Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02556/) (2023)
- [Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14203/) (2023)
- [Multimodal Fake News Detection via CLIP-Guided Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14304/) (2022)
- [ASAP: Advancing Semantic Alignment Promotes Multi-Modal Manipulation Detecting and Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12718/) (2024)
- [Unified Frequency-Assisted Transformer Framework for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09667/) (2023)
- [UniS-MMC: Multimodal Classification via Unimodality-supervised Multimodal Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09299/) (2023)
- [Unleashing the Potential of Consistency Learning for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05890/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CIEC: Coupling Implicit and Explicit Cues for Multimodal Weakly Supervised Manipulation Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02175/) (2026)
- [Evidence-Grounded Forensic Reasoning for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08009/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The task of Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM4) is a branch of misinformation detection. Unlike traditional binary classification, it includes complex subtasks such as forgery content localization and forgery method classification. Consider that existing methods are often limited in performance due to neglecting the erroneous interference caused by unreliable unimodal data and failing to establish comprehensive forgery supervision for mining fine-grained tampering traces. In this paper, we present a Fine-grained Multiple Supervisory (FMS) network, which incorporates modality reliability supervision, unimodal internal supervision and cross-modal supervision to provide comprehensive guidance for DGM4 detection. For modality reliability supervision, we propose the Multimodal Decision Supervised Correction (MDSC) module. It leverages unimodal weak supervision to correct the multi-modal decision-making process. For unimodal internal supervision, we propose the Unimodal Forgery Mining Reinforcement (UFMR) module. It amplifies the disparity between real and fake information within unimodal modality from both feature-level and sample-level perspectives. For cross-modal supervision, we propose the Multimodal Forgery Alignment Reasoning (MFAR) module. It utilizes soft-attention interactions to achieve cross-modal feature perception from both consistency and inconsistency perspectives, where we also design the interaction constraints to ensure the interaction quality. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of our FMS compared to state-of-the-art methods.