# Mitigating Persistent Client Dropout in Asynchronous Decentralized Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01807 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01807/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07586/) (2021)
- [Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00535/) (2018)
- [Directional convergence and alignment in deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06657/) (2020)
- [Decentralized Collaborative Learning of Personalized Models over Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05202/) (2016)
- [AIDE: Fast and Communication Efficient Distributed Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06879/) (2016)
- [DReS-FL: Dropout-Resilient Secure Federated Learning for Non-IID Clients via Secret Data Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02680/) (2022)
- [DJAM: distributed Jacobi asynchronous method for learning personal models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09737/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of persistent client dropout in asynchronous Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL). Asynchronicity and decentralization obfuscate information about model updates among federation peers, making recovery from a client dropout difficult. Access to the number of learning epochs, data distributions, and all the information necessary to precisely reconstruct the missing neighbor's loss functions is limited. We show that obvious mitigations do not adequately address the problem and introduce adaptive strategies based on client reconstruction. We show that these strategies can effectively recover some performance loss caused by dropout. Our work focuses on asynchronous DFL with local regularization and differs substantially from that in the existing literature. We evaluate the proposed methods on tabular and image datasets, involve three DFL algorithms, and three data heterogeneity scenarios (iid, non-iid, class-focused non-iid). Our experiments show that the proposed adaptive strategies can be effective in maintaining robustness of federated learning, even if they do not reconstruct the missing client's data precisely. We also discuss the limitations and identify future avenues for tackling the problem of client dropout.
