# Reconstructing Trust Embeddings from Siamese Trust Scores: A Direct-Sum Approach with Fixed-Point Semantics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01479/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Chain-of-Trust: A Progressive Trust Evaluation Framework Enabled by Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17130/) (2025)
- [Networked Physical Computing: A New Paradigm for Effective Task Completion via Hypergraph Aided Trusted Task-Resource Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23556/) (2025)
- [Alpay Algebra IV: Symbiotic Semantics and the Fixed-Point Convergence of Observer Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03774/) (2025)
- [Rapid and Continuous Trust Evaluation for Effective Task Collaboration Through Siamese Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17128/) (2025)
- [Semantic Chain-of-Trust: Autonomous Trust Orchestration for Collaborator Selection via Hypergraph-Aided Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23565/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study the inverse problem of reconstructing high-dimensional trust embeddings from the one-dimensional Siamese trust scores that many distributed-security frameworks expose. Starting from two independent agents that publish time-stamped similarity scores for the same set of devices, we formalise the estimation task, derive an explicit direct-sum estimator that concatenates paired score series with four moment features, and prove that the resulting reconstruction map admits a unique fixed point under a contraction argument rooted in Banach theory. A suite of synthetic benchmarks (20 devices x 10 time steps) confirms that, even in the presence of Gaussian noise, the recovered embeddings preserve inter-device geometry as measured by Euclidean and cosine metrics; we complement these experiments with non-asymptotic error bounds that link reconstruction accuracy to score-sequence length. Beyond methodology, the paper demonstrates a practical privacy risk: publishing granular trust scores can leak latent behavioural information about both devices and evaluation models. We therefore discuss counter-measures -- score quantisation, calibrated noise, obfuscated embedding spaces -- and situate them within wider debates on transparency versus confidentiality in networked AI systems. All datasets, reproduction scripts and extended proofs accompany the submission so that results can be verified without proprietary code.
