# Script Fragmentation and Format: What Drives the English-Bengali Performance Gap in Open LLMs?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23248 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23248/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11324/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03882/) (2023)
- [How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15613/) (2020)
- [Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15425/) (2023)
- [Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13707/) (2023)
- [BanglaBERT: Language Model Pretraining and Benchmarks for Low-Resource Language Understanding Evaluation in Bangla](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00204/) (2021)
- [IndicLLMSuite: A Blueprint for Creating Pre-training and Fine-Tuning Datasets for Indian Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06350/) (2024)
- [BenLLMEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation into the Potentials and Pitfalls of Large Language Models on Bengali NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13173/) (2023)
- [Khayyam Challenge (PersianMMLU): Is Your LLM Truly Wise to The Persian Language?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06644/) (2024)
- [xFinder: Large Language Models as Automated Evaluators for Reliable Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11874/) (2024)
- [Lexically Grounded Subword Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13560/) (2024)
- [A Large Multi-Target Dataset of Common Bengali Handwritten Graphemes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00170/) (2020)
- [Bridging the Bosphorus: Advancing Turkish Large Language Models through Strategies for Low-Resource Language Adaptation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04685/) (2024)
- [BanglaByT5: Byte-Level Modelling for Bangla](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17102/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [GanitLLM: Difficulty-Aware Bengali Mathematical Reasoning through Curriculum-GRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06767/) (2026)
- [Cross-Lingual Sentiment Misalignment: Auditing Multilingual Language Models for Inversion Risk, Dialectal Representation, and Affective Stability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.17469/) (2026)
- [UrduBench: An Urdu Reasoning Benchmark using Contextually Ensembled Translations with Human-in-the-Loop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21000/) (2026)
- [BenHalluEval: A Multi-Task Hallucination Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models on Bengali](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31483/) (2026)
- [Creating Multilingual Mental Health Dialogue Datasets: Limits of Persona-Based Localization via Nationality and Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19640/) (2026)
- [Do Small Models Use the Law You Give Them? Context-Injected Fine-Tuning for Legal QA in Bangladesh](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23446/) (2026)
- [Structural Silence: When AI Infrastructure Fails Speakers of Underrepresented Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.12278/) (2026)
- [Quantization Effects on Bangla Language Understanding in Large Language Models: A Systematic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24615/) (2026)
- [BANGLAPLAN: A Benchmark for Constraint-Based Planning and Decision-Making in Bangla](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19704/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Bengali is spoken by more than 230 million people, yet no standardized instrument evaluates large language models (LLMs) on Bengali across the task categories used to benchmark frontier models. We release 8 English benchmarks translated into Bengali with a single consistent pipeline and use them to evaluate 10 open LLMs from 4 families on paired English and Bengali inputs. Script fragmentation is what subword tokenizers do to Bengali's alphasyllabary, whose written units are grapheme clusters spanning several Unicode code points: they cut the script into pieces smaller than a character, at a cost set by the vocabulary rather than the script itself. Format belongs to the evaluation, the answer shape that exact-match scoring demands regardless of whether the model knew the answer. Beyond confirming a substantial gap (macro LLM-judge score 0.79 in English versus 0.63 in Bengali), we show that part of it is a measurement artifact: exact-match accuracy conflates correctness with format adherence and because format failure is asymmetric across languages it distorts the apparent gap for some models three to five fold and even reverses its sign for one reasoning-tuned model. On the fragmentation side, Bengali costs roughly five times more tokens per word than English, the 10 models share only 4 vocabularies and that cost varies twofold across them (7.9 tokens per word under Llama~3, 4.0 under Tekken), and under three of the four the average Bengali token spans fewer bytes than a single code point. Bengali is the constant here and the vocabularies are not, so what Bengali text costs is set by tokenizer design rather than by the script. Fertility and sequence length correlate only weakly with scores (r = -0.23), so we present this as a cost and segmentation concern rather than a driver of the gap. The datasets, pipeline and evaluation code are released.
