# Diverse LLMs or Diverse Question Interpretations? That is the Ensembling Question

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21168 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21168/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06146/) (2019)
- [Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02235/) (2021)
- [A Survey on In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00234/) (2022)
- [Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14608/) (2024)
- [LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02561/) (2023)
- [Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06592/) (2024)
- [Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10063/) (2022)
- [PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07559/) (2023)
- [SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06569/) (2022)
- [Diversity in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01477/) (2018)
- [Can Retriever-Augmented Language Models Reason? The Blame Game Between the Retriever and the Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09146/) (2022)
- [HoneyBee: Progressive Instruction Finetuning of Large Language Models for Materials Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08511/) (2023)
- [Optimizing Memory Placement using Evolutionary Graph Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07298/) (2020)
- [Neuroevolution-Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimization for Mixed-Precision Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07611/) (2021)
- [Do Answers to Boolean Questions Need Explanations? Yes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07772/) (2021)
- [Answering Ambiguous Questions with a Database of Questions, Answers, and Revisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08661/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Effectively leveraging diversity has been shown to improve performance for various machine learning models, including large language models (LLMs). However, determining the most effective way of using diversity remains a challenge. In this work, we compare two diversity approaches for answering binary questions using LLMs: model diversity, which relies on multiple models answering the same question, and question interpretation diversity, which relies on using the same model to answer the same question framed in different ways. For both cases, we apply majority voting as the ensemble consensus heuristic to determine the final answer. Our experiments on boolq, strategyqa, and pubmedqa show that question interpretation diversity consistently leads to better ensemble accuracy compared to model diversity. Furthermore, our analysis of GPT and LLaMa shows that model diversity typically produces results between the best and the worst ensemble members without clear improvement.