# Negation-Aware Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19064 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19064/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/prompt-learning-and-adaptation-of-clip/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05918/) (2021)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07031/) (2019)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08981/) (2021)
- [Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00685/) (2023)
- [Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00121/) (2017)
- [When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01936/) (2022)
- [Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12400/) (2023)
- [Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07511/) (2022)
- [CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07796/) (2022)
- [Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06038/) (2023)
- [Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18293/) (2024)
- [C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14119/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09425/) (2025)
- [Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20312/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Vision-Language Models for Improving Domain Generalization in Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08255/) (2023)
- [Test-Time Adaptation with CLIP Reward for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18010/) (2023)
- [Dual Prototype Evolving for Test-Time Generalization of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12790/) (2024)
- [Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10913/) (2025)
- [Any-Shift Prompting for Generalization over Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10099/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19329/) (2023)
- [Test-time Adaptation for Cross-modal Retrieval with Query Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15624/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Adapting Vision-Language Models Without Labels: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05547/) (2025)
- [Evaluating and Enhancing Negation Comprehension in Remote Sensing MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20177/) (2026)
- [NAST: Improving Negation Handling in Medical Vision-Language Models through Negation-Aware Selective Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12498/) (2026)
- [HANCLIP: A Family of Hyperbolic Angular Negation Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23843/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study a practical but less-touched problem in Vision-Language Models (VLMs), ie, negation understanding. Specifically, many real-world applications require models to explicitly identify what is false or non-existent, eg, radiologists may search for images that exclude specific conditions. Despite the impressive transferability of VLMs through large-scale training, they suffer from a critical limitation that fails to handle negation. To address this challenge, existing methods attribute its root cause to the scarcity of negation training data and propose to fine-tune VLMs on massive data containing explicit negation. Undoubtedly, such data-centric solutions demand substantial data and computational resources, limiting their sustainable widespread adoption. To tackle negation in a low-carbon manner, we empirically observe that the key obstacle lies in the dual-concept shifts between the affirmation and negation distributions. Therefore, we propose a Negation-Aware Test-Time Adaptation (NEAT) method to efficiently adjust distribution-related parameters during inference. In brief, NEAT can reduce distribution shift in consistent semantics while eliminating false distributional consistency in unrelated semantics. Extensive experiments on the various negation understanding tasks verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Remarkably, with less than 0.01% of trainable parameters, NEAT achieves comparable or superior performance to state-of-the-art post-training approaches. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhc1997/NEAT.