# A Pilot Study on LLM-Based Agentic Translation from Android to iOS: Pitfalls and Insights

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16037 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16037/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.13771/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Translation of Programming Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03511/) (2020)
- [IntelliCode Compose: Code Generation Using Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08025/) (2020)
- [A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06182/) (2017)
- [Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02977/) (2024)
- [CodePlan: Repository-level Coding using LLMs and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12499/) (2023)
- [A Transformer-based Approach for Source Code Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00653/) (2020)
- [ChatUniTest: A Framework for LLM-Based Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04764/) (2023)
- [MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08184/) (2024)
- [CodeTransOcean: A Comprehensive Multilingual Benchmark for Code Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04951/) (2023)
- [Towards Translating Real-World Code with LLMs: A Study of Translating to Rust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11514/) (2024)
- [AlphaTrans: A Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Approach for Repository-Level Code Translation and Validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24117/) (2024)
- [CoTran: An LLM-based Code Translator using Reinforcement Learning with Feedback from Compiler and Symbolic Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06755/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Code Generation: The Practitioners Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16998/) (2025)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Test Generation: How Far Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12682/) (2024)
- [TransAgent: Enhancing LLM-Based Code Translation via Fine-Grained Execution Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19894/) (2024)
- [Specification-Driven Code Translation Powered by Large Language Models: How Far Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04590/) (2024)
- [Building A Proof-Oriented Programmer That Is 64% Better Than GPT-4o Under Data Scarcity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11901/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of mobile applications has led to a significant demand for cross-platform compatibility, particularly between the Android and iOS platforms. Traditional approaches to mobile application translation often rely on manual intervention or rule-based systems, which are labor-intensive and time-consuming. While recent advancements in machine learning have introduced automated methods, they often lack contextual understanding and adaptability, resulting in suboptimal translations. Large Language Models (LLMs) were recently leveraged to enhance code translation at different granularities, including the method, class, and repository levels. Researchers have investigated common errors, limitations, and potential strategies to improve these tasks. However, LLM-based application translation across different platforms, such as migrating mobile applications between Android and iOS or adapting software across diverse frameworks, remains underexplored. Understanding the performance, strengths, and limitations of LLMs in cross-platform application translation is critical for advancing software engineering automation. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating LLM-based agentic approaches for mobile application translation, identifying key failure points, and proposing guidelines to improve translation performance. We developed a chain of agents that account for dependencies, specifications, program structure, and program control flow when translating applications from Android to iOS. To evaluate the performance, we manually examined the translated code for syntactic correctness, semantic accuracy, and functional completeness. For translation failures, we further conducted a detailed root cause analysis to understand the underlying limitations of the agentic translation process and identify opportunities for improvement.