# Towards Mitigation of Hallucination for LLM-empowered Agents: Progressive Generalization Bound Exploration and Watchdog Monitor

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15903 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15903/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09664/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13712/) (2023)
- [Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15927/) (2024)
- [Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16839/) (2023)
- [A Question-Entailment Approach to Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08079/) (2019)
- [AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14034/) (2024)
- [Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11641/) (2024)
- [LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03282/) (2024)
- [Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17173/) (2023)
- [Read before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Reading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00343/) (2022)
- [Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04121/) (2024)
- [Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19648/) (2024)
- [Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10412/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Overshadowing Causes Amalgamated Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08039/) (2024)
- [Unlocking Tokens as Data Points for Generalization Bounds on Larger Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18158/) (2024)
- [A Probabilistic Framework for LLM Hallucination Detection via Belief Tree Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06950/) (2024)
- [Augmenting LLMs with Knowledge: A survey on hallucination prevention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16459/) (2023)
- [Misconfidence-based Demonstration Selection for LLM In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06301/) (2024)
- [PoLLMgraph: Unraveling Hallucinations in Large Language Models via State Transition Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04722/) (2024)
- [Bringing order into the realm of Transformer-based language models for artificial intelligence and law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05502/) (2023)
- [User-Controlled Knowledge Fusion in Large Language Models: Balancing Creativity and Hallucination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16139/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39989/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Empowered by large language models (LLMs), intelligent agents have become a popular paradigm for interacting with open environments to facilitate AI deployment. However, hallucinations generated by LLMs-where outputs are inconsistent with facts-pose a significant challenge, undermining the credibility of intelligent agents. Only if hallucinations can be mitigated, the intelligent agents can be used in real-world without any catastrophic risk. Therefore, effective detection and mitigation of hallucinations are crucial to ensure the dependability of agents. Unfortunately, the related approaches either depend on white-box access to LLMs or fail to accurately identify hallucinations. To address the challenge posed by hallucinations of intelligent agents, we present HalMit, a novel black-box watchdog framework that models the generalization bound of LLM-empowered agents and thus detect hallucinations without requiring internal knowledge of the LLM's architecture. Specifically, a probabilistic fractal sampling technique is proposed to generate a sufficient number of queries to trigger the incredible responses in parallel, efficiently identifying the generalization bound of the target agent. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that HalMit significantly outperforms existing approaches in hallucination monitoring. Its black-box nature and superior performance make HalMit a promising solution for enhancing the dependability of LLM-powered systems.