# Artifacts of Numerical Integration in Learning Dynamical Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14491 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14491/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Hamiltonian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01563/) (2019)
- [Data-Driven Forecasting of High-Dimensional Chaotic Systems with Long Short-Term Memory Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07486/) (2018)
- [Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13334/) (2019)
- [VAMPnets: Deep learning of molecular kinetics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06012/) (2017)
- [Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06850/) (2017)
- [Data Driven Governing Equations Approximation Using Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.05537/) (2018)
- [Multistep Neural Networks for Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01236/) (2018)
- [Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11239/) (2017)
- [Neural Networks with Physics-Informed Architectures and Constraints for Dynamical Systems Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06407/) (2021)
- [On Numerical Integration in Neural Ordinary Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07335/) (2022)
- [Compositional Learning of Dynamical System Models Using Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00893/) (2022)
- [Discovery of Dynamics Using Linear Multistep Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.12728/) (2019)
- [Revealing hidden dynamics from time-series data by ODENet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04849/) (2020)
- [How to Learn and Generalize From Three Minutes of Data: Physics-Constrained and Uncertainty-Aware Neural Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06335/) (2023)
- [Explainable Deep Learning for Tumor Dynamic Modeling and Overall Survival Prediction using Neural-ODE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01362/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Aligning Reasoning LLMs for Materials Discovery with Physics-aware Rejection Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00768/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications, one needs to learn a dynamical system from its solutions sampled at a finite number of time points. The learning problem is often formulated as an optimization problem over a chosen function class. However, in the optimization procedure, prediction data from generic dynamics requires a numerical integrator to assess the mismatch with the observed data. This paper reveals potentially serious effects of a chosen numerical scheme on the learning outcome. Specifically, the analysis demonstrates that a damped oscillatory system may be incorrectly identified as having "anti-damping" and exhibiting a reversed oscillation direction, even though it adequately fits the given data points. This paper shows that the stability region of the selected integrator will distort the nature of the learned dynamics. Crucially, reducing the step size or raising the order of an explicit integrator does not, in general, remedy this artifact, because higher-order explicit methods have stability regions that extend further into the right half complex plane. Furthermore, it is shown that the implicit midpoint method can preserve either conservative or dissipative properties from discrete data, offering a principled integrator choice even when the only prior knowledge is that the system is autonomous.
