# DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11405 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11405/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12793/) (2024)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06499/) (2021)
- [NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18018/) (2023)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06539/) (2022)
- [MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18839/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14925/) (2023)
- [Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08242/) (2022)
- [Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03927/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04850/) (2023)
- [Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01964/) (2023)
- [Large-scale Multi-Modal Pre-trained Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10035/) (2023)
- [Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04244/) (2024)
- [Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00118/) (2023)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17546/) (2022)
- [Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymore](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16337/) (2023)
- [Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06059/) (2024)
- [DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09910/) (2024)
- [Quantifying Contamination in Evaluating Code Generation Capabilities of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04811/) (2024)
- [Instruction Pre-Training: Language Models are Supervised Multitask Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14491/) (2024)
- [Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10677/) (2023)
- [Can Perplexity Reflect Large Language Model's Ability in Long Text Understanding?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06105/) (2024)
- [Data Contamination Through the Lens of Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10628/) (2023)
- [Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Models: A Survey from Detection to Remediation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14644/) (2024)
- [Data Contamination Calibration for Black-box LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11930/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Do Instruction-Tuned Models Always Perform Better Than Base Models? Evidence from Math and Domain-Shifted Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13244/) (2026)
- [AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03244/) (2026)
- [LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04815/) (2026)
- [Phantom Gains: Auditing Self-Improvement Against a Measured Null](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20290/) (2026)
- [Do Assessment Instruments Measure the Same Thing for Humans and LLMs? A Latent Structure Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15630/) (2026)
- [Summarization is Not Dead Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08000/) (2026)
- [StatABench: Dataset and Framework for Evaluating Statistical Analysis Capabilities of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22977/) (2026)
- [Interpretable Humans, Alien LLMs: Expert Analysis of Latent Structures in Assessment Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17810/) (2026)
- [Learning to Zoom Efficiently with a Contrastive Curriculum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03206/) (2026)
- [Uncheatable Eval: Dynamic Compression-Based Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27510/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has heightened concerns about benchmark data contamination (BDC), where models inadvertently memorize evaluation data during the training process, inflating performance metrics, and undermining genuine generalization assessment. This paper introduces the Data Contamination Risk (DCR) framework, a lightweight, interpretable pipeline designed to detect and quantify BDC risk across four granular levels: semantic, informational, data, and label. By synthesizing contamination scores via a fuzzy inference system, DCR produces a unified DCR Factor that adjusts raw accuracy to reflect contamination-aware performance. Validated on 9 LLMs (0.5B-72B) across sentiment analysis, fake news detection, and arithmetic reasoning tasks, the DCR framework reliably diagnoses contamination severity and with accuracy adjusted using the DCR Factor to within 4% average error across the three benchmarks compared to the uncontaminated baseline. Emphasizing computational efficiency and transparency, DCR provides a practical tool for integrating contamination assessment into routine evaluations, fostering fairer comparisons and enhancing the credibility of LLM benchmarking practices.