# Foundation Models for Logistics: Toward Certifiable, Conversational Planning Interfaces

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11352 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11352/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04429/) (2022)
- [Language Model Cascades: Token-level uncertainty and beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10136/) (2024)
- [Formal-LLM: Integrating Formal Language and Natural Language for Controllable LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00798/) (2024)
- [Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12112/) (2024)
- [Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01639/) (2024)
- [Learning Safety Constraints for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24445/) (2025)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models Using Formal Methods Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18239/) (2023)
- [Multimodal Pretrained Models for Verifiable Sequential Decision-Making: Planning, Grounding, and Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05295/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty-Guided Enhancement on Driving Perception System via Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01144/) (2024)
- [Airlift Challenge: A Competition for Optimizing Cargo Delivery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17716/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Logistics operators, from battlefield coordinators re-routing airlifts ahead of a storm to warehouse managers juggling late trucks, need to make mission-critical decisions. Prevailing methods for logistics planning such as integer programming yield plans that satisfy user-defined logical constraints, assuming an idealized mathematical model of the environment. On the other hand, foundation models lower the intermediate processing barrier by translating natural-language user utterances into executable plans, yet they remain prone to misinterpretations and hallucinations that jeopardize safety and cost. We introduce a Vision-Language Logistics (VLL) agent, built on a neurosymbolic framework that pairs the accessibility of natural-language dialogue with verifiable guarantees on user-objective interpretation. The agent interprets user requests and converts them into structured planning specifications, quantifies the uncertainty of the interpretation, and invokes an interactive clarification loop when the uncertainty exceeds an adaptive threshold. Drawing on a lightweight airlift logistics planning use case as an illustrative case study, we highlight a practical path toward certifiable and user-aligned decision-making for complex logistics. Our lightweight model, fine-tuned on just 100 training samples, surpasses the zero-shot performance of 20x larger models in logistic planning tasks while cutting inference latency by nearly 50%.