# Text-Visual Semantic Constrained AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10432 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10432/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12396/) (2022)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03060/) (2023)
- [AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04717/) (2023)
- [AIGCIQA2023: A Large-scale Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images: from the Perspectives of Quality, Authenticity and Correspondence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00211/) (2023)
- [A Perceptual Quality Assessment Exploration for AIGC Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12618/) (2023)
- [Data-Efficient Image Quality Assessment with Attention-Panel Decoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04952/) (2023)
- [Large Multi-modality Model Assisted AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17762/) (2024)
- [CLIP-AGIQA: Boosting the Performance of AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment with CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15098/) (2024)
- [Bringing Textual Prompt to AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18714/) (2024)
- [TIER: Text-Image Encoder-based Regression for AIGC Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03854/) (2024)
- [AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment Based on Task-Specific Prompt and Multi-Granularity Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16087/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [EvoEmpirBench: Dynamic Spatial Reasoning with Agent-ExpVer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12718/) (2025)
- [STAR: Mitigating Cascading Errors in Spatial Reasoning via Turn-point Alignment and Segment-level DPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00558/) (2026)
- [No Place to Hide: Benchmarking Video Hallucination with Background-Controlled Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31933/) (2026)
- [Redefining Quality Criteria and Distance-Aware Score Modeling for Image Editing Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12175/) (2026)
- [Bridging Adversarial and Collaborative Learning for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24372/) (2026)
- [Are Frontier VLM Agents Ready to Be Robot Generalists? An Empirical Study with the Embodied Agent Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00854/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence Generated Image (AGI) technology, the accurate assessment of their quality has become an increasingly vital requirement. Prevailing methods typically rely on cross-modal models like CLIP or BLIP to evaluate text-image alignment and visual quality. However, when applied to AGIs, these methods encounter two primary challenges: semantic misalignment and details perception missing. To address these limitations, we propose Text-Visual Semantic Constrained AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment (SC-AGIQA), a unified framework that leverages text-visual semantic constraints to significantly enhance the comprehensive evaluation of both text-image consistency and perceptual distortion in AI-generated images. Our approach integrates key capabilities from multiple models and tackles the aforementioned challenges by introducing two core modules: the Text-assisted Semantic Alignment Module (TSAM), which leverages Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to bridge the semantic gap by generating an image description and comparing it against the original prompt for a refined consistency check, and the Frequency-domain Fine-Grained Degradation Perception Module (FFDPM), which draws inspiration from Human Visual System (HVS) properties by employing frequency domain analysis combined with perceptual sensitivity weighting to better quantify subtle visual distortions and enhance the capture of fine-grained visual quality details in images. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that SC-AGIQA outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/mozhu1/SC-AGIQA.