# Toward Adaptable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: An Assumption-Aware Review

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10142 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10142/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 107 of its 173 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 107)

- [Neural Discrete Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00937/) (2017)
- [Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02275/) (2017)
- [Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01345/) (2021)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02900/) (2018)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08926/) (2017)
- [QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11485/) (2018)
- [AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10848/) (2023)
- [The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04043/) (2019)
- [Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06676/) (2016)
- [Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10635/) (2019)
- [QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05408/) (2019)
- [Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07736/) (2016)
- [Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02948/) (2023)
- [On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05789/) (2019)
- [Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.07528/) (2019)
- [Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09533/) (2020)
- [MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.12674/) (2021)
- [QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01062/) (2020)
- [Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11180/) (2019)
- [Reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10369/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07869/) (2020)
- [Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03037/) (2017)
- [Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05438/) (2018)
- [Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08291/) (2019)
- ["Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02979/) (2020)
- [The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00506/) (2019)
- [Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08757/) (2018)
- [Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11251/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Cooperating with Future Collaborators: Multi-Agent RL under Staggered Participation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07578/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has achieved strong performance in simulated benchmarks, yet real deployments often violate the assumptions under which algorithms are designed and evaluated. Agent populations may change, objectives may shift, centralized information may be unavailable, execution may become asynchronous, and partner policies may be unfamiliar. Existing surveys discuss related desiderata such as scalability, robustness, generalization, and transferability, but these terms often refer to different objects of analysis and different kinds of distributional or structural shift. This survey proposes textitadaptability as an assumption-aware taxonomy for organizing these shifts, rather than as a universal requirement that every MARL algorithm should succeed in every setting. We distinguish three dimensions: textitlearning adaptability, which concerns the applicability of learning paradigms under changed training or system assumptions; textitpolicy adaptability, which concerns the reuse or adaptation of learned policies under deployment-time changes; and textitscenario-driven adaptability, which concerns whether benchmarks and evaluation protocols expose controlled, diagnostically useful shifts. By separating what changes, when the change occurs, what adaptation is allowed, and what success means, the framework clarifies how established concepts fit together and identifies where current MARL evaluation remains underspecified.