# OPENXRD: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for LLM/MLLM XRD Question Answering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09155 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09155/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 22 of its 102 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Chart understanding and anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/chart-understanding-and-anomaly-detection/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05782/) (2023)
- [ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13304/) (2023)
- [Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01852/) (2023)
- [Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01301/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Open-Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06984/) (2023)
- [MatSciBERT: A Materials Domain Language Model for Text Mining and Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.15290/) (2021)
- [Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17238/) (2025)
- [Can Large Language Models Empower Molecular Property Prediction?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07443/) (2023)
- [The Amazon Nova Family of Models: Technical Report and Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12103/) (2025)
- [Multi-LogiEval: Towards Evaluating Multi-Step Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17169/) (2024)
- [LLaMP: Large Language Model Made Powerful for High-fidelity Materials Knowledge Retrieval and Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17244/) (2024)
- [LLM-Prop: Predicting Physical And Electronic Properties Of Crystalline Solids From Their Text Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14029/) (2023)
- [Foundational Large Language Models for Materials Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09560/) (2024)
- [Three-dimensional Coherent X-ray Diffraction Imaging via Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00001/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Performance and Robustness of LLMs in Materials Science Q&A and Property Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14572/) (2024)
- [deCIFer: Crystal Structure Prediction from Powder Diffraction Data using Autoregressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02189/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce OPENXRD, a comprehensive benchmarking framework for evaluating large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) in crystallography question answering. The framework measures context assimilation, or how models use fixed, domain-specific supporting information during inference. The framework includes 217 expert-curated X-ray diffraction (XRD) questions covering fundamental to advanced crystallographic concepts, each evaluated under closed-book (without context) and open-book (with context) conditions, where the latter includes concise reference passages generated by GPT-4.5 and refined by crystallography experts. We benchmark 74 state-of-the-art LLMs and MLLMs, including GPT-4, GPT-5, O-series, LLaVA, LLaMA, QWEN, Mistral, and Gemini families, to quantify how different architectures and scales assimilate external knowledge. Results show that mid-sized models (7B--70B parameters) gain the most from contextual materials, while very large models often show saturation or interference and the largest relative gains appear in small and mid-sized models. Expert-reviewed materials provide significantly higher improvements than AI-generated ones even when token counts are matched, confirming that content quality, not quantity, drives performance. OPENXRD offers a reproducible diagnostic benchmark for assessing reasoning, knowledge integration, and guidance sensitivity in scientific domains, and provides a foundation for future multimodal and retrieval-augmented crystallography systems.