# GUIDE: Towards Scalable Advising for Research Ideas

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08870 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08870/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09085/) (2022)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18839/) (2024)
- [Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18416/) (2024)
- [Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01082/) (2024)
- [CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00816/) (2024)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08559/) (2023)
- [Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Latent Space Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15778/) (2024)
- [ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06119/) (2020)
- [Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17605/) (2024)
- [Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01708/) (2024)
- [Peer Review as A Multi-Turn and Long-Context Dialogue with Role-Based Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05688/) (2024)
- [MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07474/) (2021)
- [Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03262/) (2023)
- [Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13712/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [ResearchArcade: Graph Interface for Academic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22036/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The field of AI research is advancing at an unprecedented pace, enabling automated hypothesis generation and experimental design across diverse domains such as biology, mathematics, and artificial intelligence. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in the availability of scalable advising systems capable of providing high-quality, well-reasoned feedback to refine proposed hypotheses and experimental designs. To address this challenge, we explore key factors that underlie the development of robust advising systems, including model size, context length, confidence estimation, and structured reasoning processes. Our findings reveal that a relatively small model, when equipped with a well-compressed literature database and a structured reasoning framework, can outperform powerful general-purpose language models such as Deepseek-R1 in terms of acceptance rates for self-ranked top-30% submissions to ICLR 2025. Moreover, when limited to high-confidence predictions, our system achieves an acceptance rate exceeding 90% on the ICLR 2025 test set, underscoring its potential to significantly enhance the quality and efficiency of hypothesis generation and experimental design. The code is released at https://github.com/HowardLiu0830/GUIDE-Research-Idea-Evaluation.