# Dually Hierarchical Drift Adaptation for Online Configuration Performance Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08730 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08730/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Learning under Concept Drift: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05785/) (2020)
- [Multi-Objectivizing Software Configuration Tuning (for a single performance concern)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01331/) (2021)
- [BestConfig: Tapping the Performance Potential of Systems via Automatic Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03439/) (2017)
- [Do Performance Aspirations Matter for Guiding Software Configuration Tuning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03290/) (2023)
- [Transfer Learning for Performance Modeling of Configurable Systems: An Exploratory Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02280/) (2017)
- [MMO: Meta Multi-Objectivization for Software Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07303/) (2021)
- [FEMOSAA: Feature Guided and Knee Driven Multi-Objective Optimization for Self-Adaptive Software](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08933/) (2016)
- [Self-Adaptive Trade-off Decision Making for Autoscaling Cloud-Based Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.05917/) (2016)
- [The Weights can be Harmful: Pareto Search versus Weighted Search in Multi-Objective Search-Based Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03728/) (2022)
- [Predicting Configuration Performance in Multiple Environments with Sequential Meta-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03183/) (2024)
- [BiLO-CPDP: Bi-Level Programming for Automated Model Discovery in Cross-Project Defect Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.13489/) (2020)
- [Lifelong Dynamic Optimization for Self-Adaptive Systems: Fact or Fiction?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07096/) (2022)
- [Predicting Software Performance with Divide-and-Learn](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06651/) (2023)
- [Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04744/) (2024)
- [Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00840/) (2025)
- [PromiseTune: Unveiling Causally Promising and Explainable Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05995/) (2025)
- [Accuracy Can Lie: On the Impact of Surrogate Model in Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01876/) (2025)
- [White-Box Performance-Influence Models: A Profiling and Learning Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06395/) (2021)
- [Faster Configuration Performance Bug Testing with Neural Dual-level Prioritization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15392/) (2025)
- [Deep Configuration Performance Learning: A Systematic Survey and Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03322/) (2024)
- [Whence to Learn? Transferring Knowledge in Configurable Systems using BEETLE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01817/) (2019)
- [HINNPerf: Hierarchical Interaction Neural Network for Performance Prediction of Configurable Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03931/) (2022)
- [On Bootstrapping Machine Learning Performance Predictors via Analytical Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.5102/) (2014)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Revealing Domain-Spatiality Patterns for Configuration Tuning: Domain Knowledge Meets Fitness Landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19897/) (2026)
- [CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24694/) (2025)
- [Light over Heavy: Automated Performance Requirements Quantification with Linguistic Inducement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03421/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Useful Surrogate Models for Configuration Tuning Beyond Accuracy: A Fitness Landscape Analysis Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21945/) (2025)
- [Conjecture and Inquiry: Quantifying Software Performance Requirements via Interactive Retrieval-Augmented Preference Elicitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21380/) (2026)
- [CDS4RAG: Cyclic Dual-Sequential Hyperparameter Optimization for RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08333/) (2026)
- [LLMSYS-HPOBench: Hyperparameter Optimization Benchmark Suite for Real-World LLM Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08305/) (2026)
- [Configuring RAG Systems: What Breaks, Where Originates, and How to Fix](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18567/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern configurable software systems need to learn models that correlate configuration and performance. However, when the system operates in dynamic environments, the workload variations, hardware changes, and system updates will inevitably introduce concept drifts at different levels - global drifts, which reshape the performance landscape of the entire configuration space; and local drifts, which only affect certain sub-regions of that space. As such, existing offline and transfer learning approaches can struggle to adapt to these implicit and unpredictable changes in real-time, rendering configuration performance learning challenging. To address this, we propose DHDA, an online configuration performance learning framework designed to capture and adapt to these drifts at different levels. The key idea is that DHDA adapts to both the local and global drifts using dually hierarchical adaptation: at the upper level, we redivide the data into different divisions, within each of which the local model is retrained, to handle global drifts only when necessary. At the lower level, the local models of the divisions can detect local drifts and adapt themselves asynchronously. To balance responsiveness and efficiency, DHDA combines incremental updates with periodic full retraining to minimize redundant computation when no drifts are detected. Through evaluating eight software systems and against state-of-the-art approaches, we show that DHDA achieves considerably better accuracy and can effectively adapt to drifts with up to 2x improvements, while incurring reasonable overhead and is able to improve different local models in handling concept drift.