# Using Large Language Models for Legal Decision-Making in Austrian Value-Added Tax Law: A Comparative Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08468 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08468/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11462/) (2023)
- [Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18796/) (2024)
- [Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08921/) (2024)
- [RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10131/) (2024)
- [DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11325/) (2023)
- [LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16289/) (2023)
- [CBR-RAG: Case-Based Reasoning for Retrieval Augmented Generation in LLMs for Legal Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04302/) (2024)
- [LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17259/) (2024)
- [A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09136/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04459/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities Emergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07075/) (2023)
- [Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04417/) (2023)
- [Better Call GPT, Comparing Large Language Models Against Lawyers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16212/) (2024)
- [Black-box Uncertainty Quantification Method for LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11594/) (2024)
- [The Factuality of Large Language Models in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11798/) (2024)
- [Prediction of Arabic Legal Rulings using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10260/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00990/) (2024)
- [When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07748/) (2025)
- [TransformLLM: Adapting Large Language Models via LLM-Transformed Reading Comprehension Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21479/) (2024)
- [Evaluating LLM-based Approaches to Legal Citation Prediction: Domain-specific Pre-training, Fine-tuning, or RAG? A Benchmark and an Australian Law Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06272/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the framework of Austrian and European Union value-added tax (VAT) law. In tax consulting practice, clients often describe cases in natural language, making LLMs a prime candidate for supporting automated decision-making and reducing the workload of tax professionals. Given the requirement for legally grounded and well-justified analyses, the propensity of LLMs to hallucinate presents a considerable challenge. The experiments focus on two common methods for enhancing LLM performance: fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). In this study, these methods are applied on both textbook cases and real-world cases from a tax consulting firm to systematically determine the best configurations of LLM-based systems and assess the legal-reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The findings highlight the potential of using LLMs to support tax consultants by automating routine tasks and providing initial analyses, although current prototypes are not ready for full automation due to the sensitivity of the legal domain. The findings indicate that LLMs, when properly configured, can effectively support tax professionals in VAT tasks and provide legally grounded justifications for decisions. However, limitations remain regarding the handling of implicit client knowledge and context-specific documentation, underscoring the need for future integration of structured background information.