# Just Read the Question: Enabling Generalization to New Assessment Items with Text Awareness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08154 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08154/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Instructions and Guide for Diagnostic Questions: The NeurIPS 2020 Education Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12061/) (2020)
- [RKT : Relation-Aware Self-Attention for Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12736/) (2020)
- [Variational Item Response Theory: Fast, Accurate, and Expressive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00276/) (2020)
- [VarFA: A Variational Factor Analysis Framework For Efficient Bayesian Learning Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13107/) (2020)
- [Diffusion-Inspired Cold Start with Sufficient Prior in Computerized Adaptive Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12182/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LLM Evaluation on Unseen Questions: Contextual Multidimensional IRT Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22295/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has been proposed as a way to improve educational assessment by making fine-grained predictions about student performance and learning relationships between items. One challenge with many machine learning approaches is incorporating new items, as these approaches rely heavily on historical data. We develop Text-LENS by extending the LENS partial variational auto-encoder for educational assessment to leverage item text embeddings, and explore the impact on predictive performance and generalization to previously unseen items. We examine performance on two datasets: Eedi, a publicly available dataset that includes item content, and LLM-Sim, a novel dataset with test items produced by an LLM. We find that Text-LENS matches LENS' performance on seen items and improves upon it in a variety of conditions involving unseen items; it effectively learns student proficiency from and makes predictions about student performance on new items.
