# Meek Models Shall Inherit the Earth

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07931 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07931/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01318/) (2023)
- [Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05924/) (2022)
- [The Quantization Model of Neural Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13506/) (2023)
- [Mapping global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation in artificial intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04592/) (2022)
- [Scaling Scaling Laws with Board Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.03113/) (2021)
- [ALISA: Accelerating Large Language Model Inference via Sparsity-Aware KV Caching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17312/) (2024)
- [Reconciling Kaplan and Chinchilla Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12907/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00849/) (2022)
- [How predictable is language model benchmark performance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04757/) (2024)
- [The Race to Efficiency: A New Perspective on AI Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02156/) (2025)
- [Governing AI Beyond the Pretraining Frontier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15719/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [HyperMLP: An Integrated Perspective for Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12601/) (2026)
- [Two AI Metrics Diverged: Will it Make All the Difference?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00913/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The past decade has seen incredible scaling of AI systems by a few companies, leading to inequality in AI model performance. This paper argues that, contrary to prevailing intuition, the diminishing returns to compute scaling will lead to a convergence of AI model capabilities. In other words, meek models (those with limited computation budget) shall inherit the earth, approaching the performance level of the best models overall. We develop a model illustrating that under a fixed-distribution next-token objective, the marginal capability returns to raw compute shrink substantially. Given current scaling practices, we argue that these diminishing returns are strong enough that even companies that can scale their models exponentially faster than other organizations will eventually have little advantage in capabilities. As part of our argument, we give several reasons that proxies like training loss differences capture important capability measures using evidence from benchmark data and theoretical performance models. In addition, we analyze empirical data on the capability difference of AI models over time. Finally, in light of the increasing ability of meek models, we argue that AI strategy and policy require reexamination, and we outline the areas this shift will affect.
