# Checklist Engineering Empowers Multilingual LLM Judges

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06774 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06774/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18403/) (2024)
- [TICKing All the Boxes: Generated Checklists Improve LLM Evaluation and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03608/) (2024)
- [M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15522/) (2024)
- [RocketEval: Efficient Automated LLM Evaluation via Grading Checklist](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05142/) (2025)
- [M-Prometheus: A Suite of Open Multilingual LLM Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04953/) (2025)
- [MM-Eval: A Multilingual Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-as-a-Judge and Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17578/) (2024)
- [Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13439/) (2024)
- [Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for European Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08928/) (2024)
- [How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12201/) (2025)
- [How Good Are LLMs for Literary Translation, Really? Literary Translation Evaluation with Humans and LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18697/) (2024)
- [Beyond English: The Impact of Prompt Translation Strategies across Languages and Tasks in Multilingual LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09331/) (2025)
- [Cross-Lingual Auto Evaluation for Assessing Multilingual LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13394/) (2024)
- [LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10424/) (2024)
- [DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15329/) (2024)
- [RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19563/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Multilingual NLG Evaluation Abilities of LLM-Based Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04360/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17627/) (2026)
- [Beyond Time Shifts: Adapting Omni-LLM as a Reference-Free Evaluator for Generative Audio-Visual Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09091/) (2026)
- [LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24516/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated text evaluation has long been a central issue in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recently, the field has shifted toward using Large Language Models (LLMs) as evaluators-a trend known as the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm. While promising and easily adaptable across tasks, this approach has seen limited exploration in multilingual contexts. Existing multilingual studies often rely on proprietary models or require extensive training data for fine-tuning, raising concerns about cost, time, and efficiency. In this paper, we propose Checklist Engineering based LLM-as-a-Judge (CE-Judge), a training-free framework that uses checklist intuition for multilingual evaluation with an open-source model. Experiments across multiple languages and three benchmark datasets, under both pointwise and pairwise settings, show that our method generally surpasses the baselines and performs on par with the GPT-4o model.