# Simple Convergence Proof of Adam From a Sign-like Descent Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05966 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05966/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04838/) (2016)
- [On the Convergence of Adam and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09237/) (2019)
- [ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00808/) (2023)
- [signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04434/) (2018)
- [Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Condition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04636/) (2016)
- [Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06675/) (2023)
- [Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11881/) (2019)
- [Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02365/) (2019)
- [Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03466/) (2022)
- [On the Convergence of A Class of Adam-Type Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.02941/) (2018)
- [A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagrad](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02395/) (2020)
- [Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07774/) (2017)
- [An Improved Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07989/) (2020)
- [Adam Can Converge Without Any Modification On Update Rules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09632/) (2022)
- [Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between SGD and Adam on Transformers, but Sign Descent Might Be](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13960/) (2023)
- [Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13972/) (2023)
- [Improved Analysis of Clipping Algorithms for Non-convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02519/) (2020)
- [Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11195/) (2022)
- [Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19449/) (2024)
- [The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05791/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Adaptive Methods Are Preferable in High Privacy Settings: An SDE Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03226/) (2026)
- [When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06615/) (2026)
- [HomeAdam: Adam and AdamW Algorithms Sometimes Go Home to Obtain Better Provable Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02649/) (2026)
- [Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23676/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Adam is widely recognized as one of the most effective optimizers for training deep neural networks (DNNs). Despite its remarkable empirical success, its theoretical convergence analysis remains unsatisfactory. Existing works predominantly interpret Adam as a preconditioned stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), formulated as bmxt+1 = bmxt - fracγt√bmvt+ε circ bmmt. This perspective necessitates strong assumptions and intricate techniques, resulting in lengthy and opaque convergence proofs that are difficult to verify and extend. In contrast, we propose a novel interpretation by treating Adam as a sign-like optimizer, expressed as bmxt+1 = bmxt - γt frac|bmmt|√bmvt+ε circ rm Sign(bmmt). This reformulation significantly simplifies the convergence analysis. For the first time, with some mild conditions, we prove that Adam achieves the optimal rate of cal O(frac1T^sfrac14) rather than the previous cal O left(fracln TT^sfrac14right) under weak assumptions of the generalized p-affine variance and (L0, L1, q)-smoothness, without dependence on the model dimensionality or the numerical stability parameter ε. Additionally, our theoretical analysis provides new insights into the role of momentum as a key factor ensuring convergence and offers practical guidelines for tuning learning rates in Adam, further bridging the gap between theory and practice.
