# Beyond Training-time Poisoning: Component-level and Post-training Backdoors in Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04883 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04883/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Adversarial robustness and RL in finance, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Adversarial robustness and RL in finance](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/adversarial-robustness-and-rl-in-finance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00752/) (2023)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03632/) (2017)
- [Policy Teaching via Environment Poisoning: Training-time Adversarial Attacks against Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12909/) (2020)
- [BACKDOORL: Backdoor Attack against Competitive Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00579/) (2021)
- [Efficient Parallel Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04862/) (2017)
- [BadRL: Sparse Targeted Backdoor Attack Against Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12585/) (2023)
- [One-shot Neural Backdoor Erasing via Adversarial Weight Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04497/) (2022)
- [Privacy Backdoors: Stealing Data with Corrupted Pretrained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00473/) (2024)
- [BadActs: A Universal Backdoor Defense in the Activation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11227/) (2024)
- [Poisoning Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents with In-Distribution Triggers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07798/) (2021)
- [Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10530/) (2022)
- [Architectural Neural Backdoors from First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06957/) (2024)
- [Auto-Agent-Distiller: Towards Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents via Neural Architecture Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13091/) (2020)
- [Mitigating Deep Reinforcement Learning Backdoors in the Neural Activation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15168/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Plan2Cleanse: Test-Time Backdoor Defense via Monte-Carlo Planning in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09638/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) systems are increasingly used in safety-critical applications, yet their security remains severely underexplored. This work investigates backdoor attacks, which implant hidden triggers that cause malicious actions only when specific inputs appear in the observation space. Existing DRL backdoor research focuses solely on training-time attacks requiring unrealistic access to the training pipeline. In contrast, we reveal critical vulnerabilities across the DRL supply chain where backdoors can be embedded with significantly reduced adversarial privileges. We introduce two novel attacks: (1) TrojanentRL, which exploits component-level flaws to implant a persistent backdoor that survives full model retraining; and (2) InfrectroRL, a post-training backdoor attack which requires no access to training, validation, nor test data. Empirical and analytical evaluations across six Atari environments show our attacks rival state-of-the-art training-time backdoor attacks while operating under much stricter adversarial constraints. We also demonstrate that InfrectroRL further evades two leading DRL backdoor defenses. These findings challenge the current research focus and highlight the urgent need for robust defenses.
